Corpus ID: 11183276

Empirical estimates suggest most published medical research is true

@article{Jager2013EmpiricalES,
  title={Empirical estimates suggest most published medical research is true},
  author={L. Jager and J. Leek},
  journal={arXiv: Applications},
  year={2013}
}
  • L. Jager, J. Leek
  • Published 2013
  • Mathematics
  • arXiv: Applications
  • The accuracy of published medical research is critical both for scientists, physicians and patients who rely on these results. But the fundamental belief in the medical literature was called into serious question by a paper suggesting most published medical research is false. Here we adapt estimation methods from the genomics community to the problem of estimating the rate of false positives in the medical literature using reported P-values as the data. We then collect P-values from the… CONTINUE READING
    4 Citations
    A regression framework for the proportion of true null hypotheses
    • 6
    • PDF
    Methods for High Dimensional Analysis, Multiple Testing, and Visual Exploration
    • Highly Influenced

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
    Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays
    • 639
    A mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data
    • 370
    • PDF
    An Introduction to the Bootstrap
    • 16,816
    • PDF
    Comparing Several Methods to Fit Finite Mixture Models to Grouped Data by the EM Algorithm
    • 4
    • PDF
    Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text
    • 2,391
    Testing Statistical Hypotheses
    • 5,157
    Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
    • 45,903
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF