Empirical Evidence Against Decision Augmentation Theory

Abstract

Ð A reference on the Decision Augmentation Theory (May et al., 1995) includes a claim that certain data from the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research program support the DAT model while refuting bitwise influence models at the 8.6s level. We present here an analysis of the entire PEAR database published in Jahn et al. (1996), which shows that the… (More)

Topics

  • Presentations referencing similar topics