• Corpus ID: 245986577

Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security

@article{Liu2022EmpiricalAO,
  title={Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security},
  author={Yulin Liu and Yuxuan Lu and Kartik Nayak and Fan Zhang and Luyao Zhang and Yinhong Zhao},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2022},
  volume={abs/2201.05574}
}
Transaction fee mechanism (TFM) is an essential component of a blockchain protocol. However, a systematic evaluation of the real-world impact of TFMs is still absent. Using rich data from the Ethereum blockchain, mempool, and exchanges, we study the effect of EIP-1559, one of the first deployed TFMs that depart from the traditional first-price auction paradigm. We conduct a rigorous and comprehensive empirical study to examine its causal effect on blockchain transaction fee dynamics… 
What makes Ethereum blockchain transactions be processed fast or slow? An empirical study
The Ethereum platform allows developers to implement and deploy applications called ÐApps onto the blockchain for public use through the use of smart contracts. To execute code within a smart
Bribes to Miners: Evidence from Ethereum
TLDR
Bribing in Ethereum relates to stock markets, e.g., S&P 500 and Nasdaq, implying implicit interlinks between blockchain and traditional finance and the London Fork shows complicated effects on relationship between bribery and blockchain factors.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 68 REFERENCES
An analysis of the fees and pending time correlation in Ethereum
TLDR
It is concluded from the investigation that transaction's features, including gas and gas price defined by users, cannot determine the pending time of transactions.
Dynamic posted-price mechanisms for the blockchain transaction-fee market
TLDR
This work proposes an alternative design - a dynamic posted- price mechanism - which uses not only block utilization but also observable bids from past blocks to compute a posted-price for subsequent blocks, and shows its potential to reduce price volatility.
Dynamical analysis of the EIP-1559 Ethereum fee market
TLDR
A thorough analysis of the resulting fee market dynamic mechanism via a combination of tools from game theory as well as dynamical systems shows that for larger step-sizes instability and even formal Li-Yorke chaos are possible under a wide range of settings.
Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges
TLDR
This work highlights the large, complex risks created by transaction-ordering dependencies in smart contracts and the ways in which traditional forms of financial-market exploitation are adapting to and penetrating blockchain economies.
StableFees: A Predictable Fee Market for Cryptocurrencie
TLDR
It is shown that StableFees reduces the fees paid by users and reduces the variance of fee income to miners, and it is argued that the proposed fee protocol also has important social welfare and environmental benefits.
Transaction Fees on a Honeymoon: Ethereum's EIP-1559 One Month Later
TLDR
Simulation results provide evidence that variable learning rate mechanisms may constitute a promising alternative to the default EIP–1559-based format and contribute to the ongoing discussion on the design of more efficient transaction fee markets.
Transaction Fees, Block Size Limit, and Auctions in Bitcoin
TLDR
In the paper, transaction fees are model as a Nash Equilibrium outcome of an auction game with complete information and the optimal block size limit is discussed, which resolves the trade-off between including additional transactions and keeping the block capacity limited.
Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for the Ethereum Blockchain: An Economic Analysis of EIP-1559
EIP-1559 is a proposal to make several tightly coupled additions to Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism, including variable-size blocks and a burned base fee that rises and falls with demand. This
Monopoly without a Monopolist: An Economic Analysis of the Bitcoin Payment System
TLDR
This article models the novel economic structure implied by Bitcoin’s innovative decentralized design, which allows the payment system to be reliably operated by unrelated parties called miners, and finds that this decentralized design protects users from monopoly pricing.
Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?
TLDR
This work allows to quantify the BEV danger by deriving the USD extracted from sandwich attacks, liquidations, and decentralized exchange arbitrage, and formalize and analyze emerging BEV relay systems, where miners accept BEV transactions from a centralized relay server instead of the peer-to-peer (P2P) network.
...
...