• DOI:10.1006/JVBE.2001.1815
• Corpus ID: 37027572

Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work"

@article{Brotheridge2002EmotionalLA,
  title={Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work"},
  author={C{\'e}leste M. Brotheridge and Alicia A Grandey},
  journal={Journal of Vocational Behavior},
  year={2002},
  volume={60},
  pages={17-39}
}

• C. Brotheridge, A. Grandey
• Published 1 February 2002
• Psychology
• Journal of Vocational Behavior

Abstract Although it has often been presumed that jobs involving “people work” (e.g., nurses, service workers) are emotionally taxing (Maslach & Jackson, 1982), seldom is the emotional component of these jobs explicitly studied. The current study compared two perspectives of emotional labor as predictors of burnout beyond the effects of negative affectivity: job-focused emotional labor (work demands regarding emotion expression) and employee-focused emotional labor (regulation of feelings and emotional expression). Significant differences existed in the emotional demands reported by five occupational groupings. The use of surface-level emotional labor, or faking, predicted depersonalization beyond the work demands. Perceiving the demand to display positive emotions and using deep-level regulation were associated with a heightened sense of personal accomplishment, suggesting positive benefits to this aspect of work. These findings suggest new antecedents of employee burnout and clarify the emotional labor literature by comparing different conceptualizations of this concept.