Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War

@article{Mercer2013EmotionAS,
  title={Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War},
  author={J. Mercer},
  journal={International Organization},
  year={2013},
  volume={67},
  pages={221 - 252}
}
  • J. Mercer
  • Published 2013
  • Psychology
  • International Organization
Abstract What makes a diplomatic or military signal credible? In strategic settings where deception is possible, rational actors' interpretations rely on their beliefs, intuition, and imagination—they rely on emotion. Two properties of emotion—as an assimilation mechanism and its use as evidence—are key to addressing four strategic problems. First, emotion explains why actors worry needlessly about their reputations. Second, emotion is important to understanding costly signals. Third, emotion… Expand
53 Citations
Emotions and the communication of intentions in face-to-face diplomacy
  • 24
Reputation Matters: Evidence From the Korean War*
  • 2
  • PDF
Affective Politics after 9/11
  • 89
Theorizing emotions in world politics
  • 156
Norms, perverse effects, and torture
  • 4
The Illusion of International Prestige
  • J. Mercer
  • Political Science
  • International Security
  • 2017
  • 22
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 114 REFERENCES
“(Mis)interpreting Threats: A Case Study of the Korean War”
  • 7
Perception and misperception in international politics
  • 2,280
  • PDF
Rationality and Psychology in International Politics
  • J. Mercer
  • Psychology
  • International Organization
  • 2005
  • 236
Rationalist explanations for war
  • 2,860
  • PDF
Feelings and Emotions: Emotions and Rationality
  • 18
  • PDF
Fear no more: emotions and world politics
  • 266
  • PDF
The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science
  • 276
  • PDF
The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War
  • 86
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...