Emotion-Regulation Choice

  title={Emotion-Regulation Choice},
  author={Gal Sheppes and Susanne Scheibe and Gaurav Suri and James Jonathan Gross},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  pages={1391 - 1396}
Despite centuries of speculation about how to manage negative emotions, little is actually known about which emotion-regulation strategies people choose to use when confronted with negative situations of varying intensity. On the basis of a new process conception of emotion regulation, we hypothesized that in low-intensity negative situations, people would show a relative preference to choose to regulate emotions by engagement reappraisal, which allows emotional processing. However, we expected… 

Figures from this paper

Uninstructed emotion regulation choice in four studies of cognitive reappraisal.
Emotion regulation choice: the role of environmental affordances
It is shown that reappraisal affordances have stability across people and across time, and are confounded with emotional intensity for a standardised set of picture stimuli.
Emotion regulation choice: selecting between cognitive regulation strategies to control emotion
The intersection between affective science and decision making as manifested in emotion regulation choice is concentrated on, defined as the act of making an autonomous choice between different regulation strategies that are available in a particular context.
Dynamic processes in emotion regulation choice
Using a dynamic perspective, selecting reappraisal in the preceding trial and greater negative affect preceding the current trial were associated with lower odds of choosing distraction and support dynamic theories of ER.
Do the Ends Dictate the Means in Emotion Regulation?
The findings show that what people want to feel can determine how they regulate emotions and that emotional dysfunction is linked to less flexibility in matching strategies to goals.
Cut! that’s a wrap: regulating negative emotion by ending emotion-eliciting situations
It is concluded that situation-targeted ER processes are used to regulate emotional responses to high-arousal negative and low-Arousal neutral situations; ER processes other than overt AD may be used to compensate for ER failure in this context.
Choose change: Situation modification, distraction, and reappraisal in mild versus intense negative situations
Despite the theoretical importance and applied potential of situation modification as an emotion regulation strategy, empirical research on how people change situations to regulate their emotions is
The generality of effects of emotional experience on emotion-regulation choice.
It is suggested that emotional experiences directly impact people's strategic inclinations through their preferred strategies of regulating emotional responses to previewed and not-yet-encountered stimuli.
Emotion Regulation Compensation Following Situation Selection Failure
It is concluded that although people choose situations based on affect, they do not generally use the alternative ER strategies that are assessed (rumination, reappraisal, distraction) to compensate when the situations they select fail to materialize in this experimental context.
Neural processing of emotional-intensity predicts emotion regulation choice.
This study provides the first direct evidence for the role of online emotional-intensity processing in predicting behavioral regulatory-choices and demonstrated in finding that actual implementation of distraction relative to reappraisal-choice resulted in stronger attenuation of LPPs and self-reported arousal.


Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences.
This review focuses on two commonly used strategies for down-regulating emotion, reappraisal and suppression, and concludes with a consideration of five important directions for future research on emotion regulation processes.
How to regulate emotion? Neural networks for reappraisal and distraction.
Functional connectivity patterns of the amygdala activation confirmed the roles of these specific activations for the 2 emotion regulation strategies, and showed a stronger decrease in amygdala activity for distraction when compared with reappraisal.
Is Timing Everything? Temporal Considerations in Emotion Regulation
  • G. SheppesJ. Gross
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2011
An alternative process-specific timing hypothesis is offered, in which emotion-generative and emotion-regulatory processes compete at either earlier or later stages of information processing.
Handbook of Emotion Regulation
Emotion regulation and present a common framework for understanding emotion regulation, the process model of emo regulation, in the Handbook of Emotion Regulation, edited by James J. Gross.
The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review
The present article reviews modern research on the psychology of emotion regulation. Emotion regulation determines the offset of emotional responding and is thus distinct from emotional sensitivity,
Better Late Than Never? On the Dynamics of Online Regulation of Sadness Using Distraction and Cognitive Reappraisal
Examining online regulation via distraction and cognitive reappraisal by manipulating the strategy initiation point in sadness-evoking films suggested a possible point of no return for this strategy: adopting a detached view late in the ETE may be difficult.
Feelings don't come easy: studies on the effortful nature of feelings.
The results showed that the intensity of both negative and positive feelings diminished under a cognitive load and that this attenuation of feeling was not mediated by either distraction from external stimuli or demand characteristics.
Expressive flexibility.
This investigation extends research on expressive flexibility by demonstrating the stability of EF across a 3-year period, and replicating the association between EF and positive adjustment using a more objective measure of adjustment (obtained from participants' close friends rather than based on self-report).
Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing.
The findings suggest that affective responses serve different functions-mobilization for action, attention, and social communication-and reflect the motivational system that is engaged, its intensity of activation, and the specific emotional context.