El autómata versus el prójimo: Merleau-Ponty, crítico de Descartes

@article{Calvo2008ElAV,
  title={El aut{\'o}mata versus el pr{\'o}jimo: Merleau-Ponty, cr{\'i}tico de Descartes},
  author={Karina Pilar Trilles Calvo},
  journal={Logos},
  year={2008},
  volume={41},
  pages={33-63}
}
With Cartesio appears the ontological rupture between the res cogitans and the res extensa, division that it goes accompanied by the dichotomy certainty – doubt. Applying this outline to the human being, we find a conscience separated from the world, a body-machine, a cogito and a body that aren’t intrinsically united. For that reason, the vision of a body is not to enter in contact with a conscience, which, ultimately, prevents to explain the other people's existence. Merleau-Ponty seeks to… 
1 Citations

References

SHOWING 1-3 OF 3 REFERENCES
Le visible et l'invisible : suivi de notes de travail
« Du grand ouvrage dont revait Merleau-Ponty ne restent que cent cinquante pages manuscrites. Quelle est leur fonction : introduire. Il s'agit de diriger le lecteur vers un domaine que ses habitudes
Trilles Calvo Facultad de Letras Avda