Efficient Parallel Graph Algorithms for Coarse-Grained Multicomputers and BSP


In this paper we present deterministic parallel algorithms for the coarse-grained multicomputer (CGM) and bulk synchronous parallel (BSP) models for solving the following well-known graph problems: (1) list ranking, (2) Euler tour construction in a tree, (3) computing the connected components and spanning forest, (4) lowest common ancestor preprocessing, (5) tree contraction and expression tree evaluation, (6) computing an ear decomposition or open ear decomposition, and (7) 2-edge connectivity and biconnectivity (testing and component computation). The algorithms require O(log  p) communication rounds with linear sequential work per round (p = no. processors, N = total input size). Each processor creates, during the entire algorithm, messages of total size O(log  (p) (N/p)) . The algorithms assume that the local memory per processor (i.e., N/p ) is larger than p ε , for some fixed ε > 0 . Our results imply BSP algorithms with O(log  p) supersteps, O(g log  (p) (N/p)) communication time, and O(log  (p) (N/p)) local computation time. It is important to observe that the number of communication rounds/ supersteps obtained in this paper is independent of the problem size, and grows only logarithmically with respect to p . With growing problem size, only the sizes of the messages grow but the total number of messages remains unchanged. Due to the considerable protocol overhead associated with each message transmission, this is an important property. The result for Problem (1) is a considerable improvement over those previously reported. The algorithms for Problems (2)—(7) are the first practically relevant parallel algorithms for these standard graph problems.

DOI: 10.1007/s00453-001-0109-4

Extracted Key Phrases

Each processor, sequentially performs weighted list ranking on R with weights w( ), thereby computing for each j in R its rank rank_L(j) in L

Showing 1-10 of 61 extracted citations


Citations per Year

127 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has received between 82 and 197 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.