Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

@article{Kerlikowske1995EfficacyOS,
  title={Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.},
  author={Karla Kerlikowske and Deborah Grady and Susan M. Rubin and Christian Sandrock and Virginia L. Ernster},
  journal={JAMA},
  year={1995},
  volume={273 2},
  pages={
          149-54
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of screening mammography by age, number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, and duration of follow-up. DESIGN Literature review and meta-analysis. DATA IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS: Literature search of English-language studies reported from January 1966 to October 31, 1993, using MEDLINE, manual literature review, and consultation with experts. A total of 13 studies were selected, and their results were combined using meta-analytic… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 467 CITATIONS, ESTIMATED 58% COVERAGE

Systematic reviews as a ‘lens of evidence’: Determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening

  • International journal of cancer
  • 2019
VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
CITES RESULTS, METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Sonographic Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

VIEW 10 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND, METHODS & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Mammography Rescreening Among Older California Women

  • Health care financing review
  • 2001
VIEW 10 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

1995
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 18 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 10 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019

References

Publications referenced by this paper.