Efficacy and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of adult unipolar and bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised sham-controlled trials

@article{Mutz2018EfficacyAA,
  title={Efficacy and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of adult unipolar and bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised sham-controlled trials},
  author={J. Mutz and Daniel Edgcumbe and Andr{\'e} Russowsky Brunoni and Cynthia H. Y. Fu},
  journal={Neuroscience \& Biobehavioral Reviews},
  year={2018},
  volume={92},
  pages={291-303}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of adult major depressive episodes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 113 randomised clinical trials

TLDR
It is found that non-surgical brain stimulation techniques constitute viable alternative or add-on treatments for adult patients with major depressive episodes and are at least as acceptable as sham treatment.

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis

TLDR
These findings provide evidence for the consideration of non-surgical brain stimulation techniques as alternative or add-on treatments for adults with major depressive episodes and highlight important research priorities in the specialty of brain stimulation.

Treatment of mixed depression with theta-burst stimulation (TBS): results from a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial

TLDR
Bilateral TBS targeting the DLPFC is not efficacious as an add-on treatment of acute bipolar and unipolar mixed depression and theta-burst stimulation protocol replacing conventional protocols in mixed states.

Efficacy and safety of daily home-based transcranial direct current stimulation as adjunct treatment for bipolar depressive episodes: Double-blind sham-controlled randomized clinical trial

TLDR
Even though there was no evidence for the efficacy of home-based tDCS for patients with BD, this tool was found to be a safe and tolerable treatment modality for BD.

Treatment effect variation in brain stimulation across psychiatric disorders

TLDR
Evidence for treatment effect variation in brain stimulation, particularly for studies in schizophrenia, is found, suggesting that the need for personalized or stratified medicine is still an open question.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 61 REFERENCES

Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials

TLDR
HF-rTMS seems to be associated with clinically relevant antidepressant effects and with a benign tolerability profile, and is found equally effective as an augmentation strategy or as a monotherapy for MD, and when used in samples with primary unipolar MD or in mixed samples with unipolar and bipolar MD.

A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Major Depression

TLDR
O Ongoing, controlled studies should provide further clarification on the efficacy of this stimulation configuration in TRD as a number of methodological limitations warrant caution in generalizing from this study.

Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and effective treatment for major depression (MD). However, the perceived lack of a suitable sham rTMS condition might have compromised

Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of depression in bipolar affective disorder: a pilot study of acute safety and efficacy.

TLDR
Daily left prefrontal rTMS appears safe in depressed BPAD subjects, and the risk of inducing mania inBPAD subjects on medications is small, and it is failed to find statistically significant TMS clinical antidepressant effects greater than sham.

A randomized, controlled trial of sequential bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

OBJECTIVE High-frequency left-side repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and low-frequency stimulation to the right prefrontal cortex have both been shown to have antidepressant

Bilateral prefrontal rTMS and theta burst TMS as an add-on treatment for depression: A randomized placebo controlled trial

  • J. PrasserM. Schecklmann B. Langguth
  • Psychology
    The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry
  • 2015
TLDR
This pilot study did not reveal significant advantages of bilateral TBS or rTMS over sham treatment as an add-on treatment for major depression, but there was a tendency towards an increased responder rate at the end of the follow-up period for both active treatments as compared to sham.
...