Efficacy and Cross-Domain Effects of a Morphosyntax and a Phonology Intervention.

@article{Tyler2002EfficacyAC,
  title={Efficacy and Cross-Domain Effects of a Morphosyntax and a Phonology Intervention.},
  author={Ann A. Tyler and Kerry E. Lewis and Allison M. Haskill and Leslie C. Tolbert},
  journal={Language, speech, and hearing services in schools},
  year={2002},
  volume={33 1},
  pages={
          52-66
        }
}
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was three-fold: (a) to determine the efficacy of a morphosyntax and a phonology intervention against a no-treatment control group, (b) to assess the effects of those interventions on the non-targeted domain, and (c) to evaluate sequence effects when children receive both interventions. METHOD Twenty preschoolers with impairments in both morphosyntax and phonology were assigned randomly to an intervention of two 12-week blocks beginning with either a block of… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Outcomes of different speech and language goal attack strategies.
TLDR
Preliminary evidence is provided that alternating phonological and morphosyntactic goals may be preferable when children have co-occurring deficits in these domains; further research regarding cross-domain intervention outcomes is necessary.
The Effectiveness of Two Grammar Treatment Procedures for Children With SLI: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
TLDR
Treatment that used a structured cueing hierarchy designed to elicit a correct production following a child's error resulted in significantly greater improvement in expressive grammar than treatment that provided a recast following an error.
Predictors of phonological change following intervention.
TLDR
The purpose of this study was to determine the best predictor or combination of predictors of change in percentage of consonants correct (PCC) as a result of speech-language intervention and to replicate this procedure with a second group of 20 participants.
The case for morphophonological intervention: Evidence from a Greek-speaking child with speech difficulties
Intervention with children with speech and language difficulties has been proven beneficial compared with no treatment yet, knowing what type of intervention to provide remains a challenge. Studies
Treatment procedure in SLI 1 The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI : A randomized clinical trial
Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Method: A double blind superiority trial with cluster
Phonological and morphosyntactic intervention for a twin pair
Two 6-year-old male fraternal twins each received 8 weeks of morphosyntactic and phonological intervention in counterbalanced order. Progress occurred for most targets and measures, with each child
Intervention efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder.
  • M. M. Allen
  • Medicine
    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
  • 2013
TLDR
Preschool children with SSD who received the multiple oppositions approach made significantly greater gains when they were provided with a more intensive dose frequency and when cumulative intervention intensity was held constant.
Treatment effects on cluster development in the speech of 4-year-old children with speech disorder
Purpose: This study examined the effectiveness of two differing interventions to improve the consonant cluster production in six children aged 4-5 years with concomitant speech sound disorder and
Literate Language Intervention With High-Need Prekindergarten Children: A Randomized Trial.
TLDR
The intervention holds the potential to positively affect understanding and production of syntax and semantic features, such as prepositions and conjunctions, in young children with weak oral language skills.
Intervention for co-occurring speech and language difficulties: Addressing the relationship between the two domains
Although many children are referred with difficulties in both their speech and their language, the literature offers relatively little guidance on their therapy. Should clinicians treat these
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
The effects of phonological intervention on morphosyntactic development in preschool children with phonological and morphosyntactic disorders
This study examines the effects of direct (nonlinear) phonological intervention on phonological and morphosyntactic development for children severely impaired in both domains. Subjects were 9
Effects of grammar facilitation on the phonological performance of children with speech and language impairments.
TLDR
It is concluded that despite a close relationship between the development of grammar and phonology, language intervention approaches for children approximately 4 to 6 years of age should address phonological problems directly if significant effects on phonology are to be expected.
Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairment: an experimental evaluation.
TLDR
The results support the viability of the specific contributions of the focused stimulation procedures and the cyclical goal attack strategy and the participation of parents as primary intervention agents in grammar facilitation programs.
The effectiveness of a prosodic intervention on children’s metrical patterns
Use of a trochaic template (S-w) stress pattern in early words and phrases has been documented in both normal and disordered populations. The purpose of this multiple baseline study was to determine
Effects of phonological versus language intervention in preschoolers with both phonological and language impairment
Preschool children with both phonological and language impairment received either phonological intervention involving a 'cycles' approach or language intervention involving a 'script' approach. Pre-
Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment.
TLDR
The results indicated that although both kinds of treatments were effective in triggering acquisition of most targets, consistently fewer presentations to first spontaneous use were required in the conversational procedure.
Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment.
TLDR
The findings show that a diverse set of morphemes share the property of tense marking, and that this set is not mastered until age 4 years in typically developing children and after 7 years for children with SLI; that acquisition shows linear and nonlinear components for both groups, in a typical S-shaped curve.
Associations between phonology and syntax in speech-delayed children.
TLDR
Interactions between phonology and syntax are inspected in continuous speech samples from 30 speech-delayed children, showing evidence of overall syntactic delay and half show some limitation in the use of phonetically complex morphophonemes, their performance in that area being below the level of their syntactic production.
Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive.
TLDR
It was found that the children with SLI used nonfinite forms of lexical verbs, or omitted BE and DO, more frequently than children in the 5N and 3N groups, and when theChildren with SLI marked finiteness, they did so appropriately.
Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: a discriminant function analysis.
TLDR
The verb morpheme composite was considered to hold promise as a clinical marker for SLI and growing evidence that problems with finite verb morphology continue into the school years in children with SLI.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...