• DOI:10.1023/A:1012051510584
• Corpus ID: 37768360

Effects of prairie and barrens management on butterfly faunal composition

@article{Swengel2001EffectsOP,
  title={Effects of prairie and barrens management on butterfly faunal composition},
  author={Ann B. Swengel and Scott R Swengel},
  journal={Biodiversity \& Conservation},
  year={2001},
  volume={10},
  pages={1757-1785}
}

• A. Swengel, S. Swengel
• Published 1 October 2001
• Environmental Science
• Biodiversity & Conservation

During 1990–1997, we recorded 122 138 adult butterflies in transect surveys at 125 pine-oak barrens in northern Wisconsin and 106 tallgrass prairies in six midwestern states grouped into three prairie subregions. Before analysis, we classified the butterflies into three ecological subgroups: specialist of native herbaceous vegetation, grassland (widely occurring in native and degraded herbaceous vegetation), and generalist. We analyzed this dataset both by ecological subgroups and as total butterflies, and by relative density and species richness, to investigate how these different ways of ordinating the same dataset might affect the results. In multiple linear regressions, density and richness of total butterflies and the subgroups related significantly to many non-management factors. In comparisons of more vs. less recent burning, all significant results for most recent burning were negative. No significant negative relationships were attributed to the longest period since burning. In comparisons of burning vs. idling, all significant results in prairie favored idling, but in barrens favored burning. In comparisons of burning vs. mechanical cutting, all significant results in prairie favored cutting, but no significant differences occurred in barrens. In regressions including all management types, rotational burning (alone or combined with cutting) was significantly positive most often for generalists and never for specialists. Increasing years since last management was always negative in barrens and the southern prairie subregion but always positive in the two northern prairie subregions. Significant management patterns occurred more often in prairie than barrens, which were less fragmented. Specialists were favored by grazing in one northern prairie subregion (but disfavored in the other), haying, single wildfire (testable in barrens only), and increasing years since last treatment in one northern prairie subregion (but disfavored in barrens). Within subregion and subgroup, significant management results for density and richness never conflicted, but density had more significant results than richness. In no instances were the signs opposite when total butterflies and/or any subgroup(s) significantly related to the same management factor in the same type of regression. But what was significant for one sample was often not for another. Thus, management favorable for specialists and total butterflies did not conflict, but the subgroups had varying degrees of sensitivity, rather than opposite responses. Since the specialist (and total) butterflies did not consistently favor one management type over another among subregions, caution should be used in preserve management, to avoid overreliance on one management type over others.