Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings

@article{Demarco2009EffectsOM,
  title={Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings},
  author={Fl{\'a}vio Fernando Demarco and T Pereira-Cenci and D{\'a}rvi de Almeida Andr{\'e} and Renata Pereira de Sousa Barbosa and Evandro Piva and Maximiliano Sergio Cenci},
  journal={Clinical Oral Investigations},
  year={2009},
  volume={15},
  pages={39-47}
}
This study evaluated the performance of composite restorations placed with two matrix and wedge systems 4 years after placement. In a split-mouth design, 23 patients were selected and received at least two class II restorations, one with metallic matrix and wooden wedge and the other with polyester matrix and reflective wedge. One dentist placed the 109 restorations, and all cavities were restored using Single Bond and P-60 (3M ESPE) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerization… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 41 references

One year clinical comparison of metal and translucent matrices in class II resin composite restorations

MS Cenci, FF Demarco, CL Pereira, RG Lund, RM Carvalho
Am J Dent • 2007
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

the 10-year report

P Gaengler, I Hoyer, restorations Montag R Clinical evaluation of posterior composite
J Adhes Dent 3:185–194 46 Clin Oral Invest • 2011
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…