Effects of lying in practical Turing tests

  title={Effects of lying in practical Turing tests},
  author={K. Warwick and Huma Shah},
  journal={AI & SOCIETY},
Interpretation of utterances affects an interrogator’s determination of human from machine during live Turing tests. Here, we consider transcripts realised as a result of a series of practical Turing tests that were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. The focus in this paper is to consider the effects of lying and truth-telling on the human judges by the hidden entities, whether human or a machine. Turing test transcripts provide a glimpse into short text communication, the type… Expand
18 Citations

Topics from this paper

Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments
  • 4
  • PDF
Can machines think? A report on Turing test experiments at the Royal Society
  • 33
  • PDF
Assumption of knowledge and the Chinese Room in Turing test interrogation
  • 7
The importance of a human viewpoint on computer natural language capabilities: a Turing test perspective
  • 9
The Turing Test: A New Appraisal
  • 9
Passing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity
  • 8
  • PDF
Outwitted by the Hidden: Unsure Emotions
  • 10
Towards a unified framework for developing ethical and practical Turing tests
  • 2
  • Highly Influenced


Deception-detection and machine intelligence in practical Turing tests
  • 13
Some Implications of a Sample of Practical Turing Tests
  • 20
Good Machine Performance in Turing's Imitation Game
  • K. Warwick, Huma Shah
  • Computer Science
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games
  • 2014
  • 26
  • PDF
Hidden Interlocutor Misidentification in Practical Turing Tests
  • 24
Alan Turing: His Work and Impact
  • 41
  • PDF
Lying and falsely implicating
  • 64
  • PDF
The Definition of Lying
  • 93
  • PDF
Computing Machinery and Intelligence.
  • 3,453
  • PDF
Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked
  • 240
  • PDF