Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden

  title={Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden},
  author={Sarah S{\"a}ll and Ing-Marie Gren},
  journal={Food Policy},

Essays on economic policy on food consumption

This thesis consists of four papers investigating the use of taxes on food consumption. The aim is providing policy information concerning what to eat from an environmental and health perspective. In


Livestock cause around 10% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the European Union. Despite the large quantities, no economic policy is in place to reduce emissions from the sector. In this

Hunger for meat: can animal protein-based taxation reverse the trend?

Climate change is in the agenda of food policy. Livestock is recognized to be by far the biggest contributor to food-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE). This article examines the potential

A social cost-benefit analysis of meat taxation and a fruit and vegetables subsidy for a healthy and sustainable food consumption in the Netherlands

The studied meat taxes and F&V subsidy showed net total welfare benefits for the Dutch society over a 30-year time horizon.

Environmental food taxes and inequalities: Simulation of a meat tax in Sweden

Consumer demand for meat in Finland

This paper focuses on meat consumption patterns in Finland. Empirical analysis for this paper was based on the micro data of three Household Budget Surveys: 1998, 2006 and 2012. A censored linear

Environmental, Nutritional and Welfare Effects of Introducing a Carbon Tax on Food Products in Spain

Current dietary habits contribute immensely to climate change as a result of the large amount of greenhouse gas production. Demand-side measures have been proved to be efficient to reduce greenhouse

Distributional effects of environmental meat taxes in Sweden- Can the poor still eat meat?

This paper looks at the distributional effect of an environmental tax on meat in Sweden, if such a tax was to be introduced. Welfare effects are measured as Compensation Variation (CV) for multiple



Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects

Agriculture is responsible for 25–30% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but has thus far been largely exempted from climate policies. Because of high monitoring costs and

Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - implications for long-term climate targets.

Structural changes in food consumption towards less emission-intensive food might be required for meeting the 2° target, due to the relatively limited potential for reducing food-related emissions by higher productivity and technological means.

The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets

For agriculture, there are three major options for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: 1) productivity improvements, particularly in the livestock sector; 2) dedicated technical mitigation

Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies.

A targeted food tax combined with the appropriate subsidy on fruits and vegetables could reduce deaths from CVD and cancer.

Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health