Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Population Dynamics

@article{Wiegand2005EffectsOH,
  title={Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Population Dynamics},
  author={Thorsten Wiegand and Eloy Revilla and Kirk A. Moloney},
  journal={Conservation Biology},
  year={2005},
  volume={19}
}
Abstract:  We used a spatially explicit population model that was generalized to produce nine ecological profiles of long‐lived species with stable home ranges and natal dispersal to investigate the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population dynamics. We simulated population dynamics in landscapes composed of three habitat types (good‐quality habitat ranging from 10–25%, poor‐quality habitat ranging from 10–70%, and matrix). Landscape structures varied from highly fragmented to… 

Survival in patchy landscapes: the interplay between dispersal, habitat loss and fragmentation

TLDR
It is shown that a higher survival rate is achieved in instances with a lower number of patches of larger areas, demonstrating how movement may counterbalance the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation in altered landscapes.

Spatial pattern of habitat quality modulates population persistence in fragmented landscapes

TLDR
The results demonstrate explicitly that the spatial pattern of within-patch habitat quality plays an important role in modulating the effects of habitat fragmentation on populations, and suggest that managing habitat quality in existing habitat remnants is important to preserve species in habitats undergoing fragmentation, particularly for those with specialized habitat requirements.

Joint effects of habitat configuration and temporal stochasticity on population dynamics

TLDR
Greater environmental variability, as might arise due to climate change, is likely to compound population losses due to habitat fragmentation and may directly reduce population size if reproductive output is compromised, and it may also increase variability in population size.

Independent effects of fragmentation on forest songbirds: an organism-based approach.

TLDR
The results support the hypothesis that landscape pattern is important for some species only when the amount of suitable habitat is low, and indicate that manipulating landscape pattern may reduce negative impacts of habitat loss for Ovenbird, but not Blackburnian Warbler.

Fundy Model Forest ~ Partners in Sustainability

The degree to which spatial patterns influence the dynamics and distribution of populations is a central question in ecology. This question is even more pressing in the context of rapid habitat loss

The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red‐cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)

TLDR
It is found that population genetic structure was more strongly affected by fragmentation than population size, which suggests that examining only population size may limit recognition of fragmentation effects that erode genetic variation.

Habitat specialization interacts with habitat amount to determine dispersal success of rodents in fragmented landscapes

TLDR
Empirical support is provided for the interaction between habitat specialization and habitat amount in determining the response of species to habitat loss, showing that theresponse of habitat specialists—in contrast to generalists—is governed by the landscape-wide amount of habitat.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES

When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival

HABITAT LOSS AND POPULATION DECLINE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PATCH SIZE EFFECT

TLDR
No evidence that patch size effects were related to landscape character- istics such as the proportion of landscape covered by habitat, median patch size, or the scale at which a study was conducted was found.

Using Landscape Indices to Predict Habitat Connectivity

TLDR
Nine common indices of habitat pattern were examined and a new pattern index was identified, termed patch cohesion, for which the fit was much better and was found to be insensitive to the details and artifacts of the dispersal model.

Patchy Reaction‐Diffusion and Population Abundance: The Relative Importance of Habitat Amount and Arrangement

TLDR
Habitat arrangement effects became important when species persistence became uncertain due to dispersal mortality when the probability of landscapes supporting viable populations was reduced.

Relative Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Population Extinction

TLDR
It is suggested that details of how habitats are arranged cannot usually mitigate the risks of habitat loss, and conservation efforts should be aimed foremost at stopping habitat loss and at habitat restoration.

Habitat fragmentation

The body of evidence on the threats to biodiversity caused by habitat fragmentation is constantly growing and this is particularly true in areas where the problem is most critical, as illustrated by

METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE

TLDR
It is demonstrated how the effects of habitat quality and detailed landscape structure can be included in a spatially realistic metapopulation model, the incidence function model, and demonstrated that additional complexity beyond the results of habitat patch area and isolation does not necessarily improve the predictive power of a metapoulation model.

The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization

TLDR
An individual-based dispersal model to measure immigration and emigration rates between habitat islands within hetero- geneous landscapes is developed and it is shown that corridors are often diffuse and difficult to identify from structural features of the landscape.

Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics

TLDR
The model allows us to compare the relative contribution of different types of habitats to a species' growth rate and population size and predict how the loss of habitat of a particular type may affect a population.

Population responses to habitat fragmentation: statistical power and the random sample hypothesis

TLDR
The statistical power to detect differences, between a model based on the random sample hypothesis and a model which included effects of habitat fragment size and isolation between habitat fragments on population survival, was low in landscapes with a high proportion of suitable habitat, but increased as the proportion of suited habitat decreased.