Effect of high hip center on stress for dysplastic hip.

@article{Nie2014EffectOH,
  title={Effect of high hip center on stress for dysplastic hip.},
  author={Yong Nie and Fuxing Pei and Zongming Li},
  journal={Orthopedics},
  year={2014},
  volume={37 7},
  pages={
          e637-43
        }
}
High hip center reconstruction has been advocated in treating deficient acetabulum. However, there is no consensus on the clinical outcome of this technique. In addition, it remains unclear to what extend this technique restores the normal hip biomechanics. The goal of this study was to investigate stress above the acetabular dome in response to a range of high hip center positioning for Crowe type I and II hip dysplasia. This study consisted of 2 main parts, radiologic and biomechanical… 
The Best Bone of Acetabulum for Cup Component Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Crowe Type I-III Dysplastic Hips: a Computer Simulation Study
TLDR
During acetabular reconstruction in Crowe type I, II, or III hips, slightly superior placements, <25 mm from the ITL, retained sufficient bone coverage, and correlates with the degree of hip dysplasia in patients.
Best bone of acetabulum for cup component placement in Crowe types I to III dysplastic hips: a computer simulation study
TLDR
During acetabular reconstruction, slightly superior placement with V-HCC <25 mm retained sufficient bone coverage in Crowe I to III hips.
Cross-sectional Anatomy of Ilium for Guiding Acetabular Component Placement Using High Hip Center Technique in Asian Population
TLDR
HHC reconstructions within 1 cm above the acetabular dome will be an acceptable and smaller diameter prosthesis would be better.
Best bone of acetabulum for cup component placement in Crowe types I to III dysplastic hips: a computer simulation study.
TLDR
During acetabular reconstruction, slightly superior placement with V-HCC <25 mm retained sufficient bone coverage in Crowe I to III hips.
Primary Stability in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: Comparison of the Stability of Cementless Fixed Augments on a Modular Acetabular Cage System with and without Cranial Straps
TLDR
A significant increase of primary stability between the shell and the bone through the addition of cranial straps is concluded and a clinical impact of this finding is uncertain and requires further investigation.
Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments
TLDR
Cement fixation between a porous titanium acetabular component and augment is associated with less relative movement than screw fixation alone for all implant interfaces, particularly with increasing loads, and comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabULAR components and augments is compared.
Joint Replacement in the Dysplastic Patient: Surgical Considerations and Techniques
Arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the dysplastic hip increases in complexity depending on the patho-anatomy of the deformity and degree of subluxation/dislocation of the femur.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
High Hip Center Technique Using a Biconical Threaded Zweymüller® Cup in Osteoarthritis Secondary to Congenital Hip Disease
TLDR
The high hip center technique using a biconical threaded Zweymüller® cup in patients with arthritis secondary to congenital hip disease results in a polyethylene wear rate and long-term cup survivorship comparable to those observed in anatomically positioned cups.
Cross-sectional Anatomy of the Ilium: Implications for Acetabular Component Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty
TLDR
The thickness of the human ilium was determined and related it to acetabulum cup coverage in high hip center reconstructions and there are substantial anatomic limitations to high hip reconstructions 2 cm above the acetabular dome.
Micromotion measurements with hip center and modular neck length alterations.
TLDR
It was found that extending the neck length 12.5 mm produced a dramatic increase in micromotion, suggesting that hip center lateralization and the use of long modular neck lengths should be avoided.
The Effect of Superior Placement of the Acetabular Component on the Rate of Loosening after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Long-Term Results in Patients Who Have Crowe Type-II Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip*
TLDR
It is suggested that superior positioning of the acetabular component, even without lateral displacement, leads to increased rates of loosening of the femoral and acetABular components.
How Superior Placement of the Joint Center in Hip Arthroplasty Affects the Abductor Muscles
TLDR
It is suggested that superior positioning of the hip center, without lateral placement, does not have major, adverse effects on abduction moment arms or force generating capacities when the neck length is appropriately increased.
Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates.
TLDR
Long-term follow-up studies using logistical regression analysis demonstrate significantly higher rates of femoral loosening with acetabular components placed in a superior and lateral (i.e., nonanatomic) position, compared with acetABular componentsplaced in a nearly anatomic position.
Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study.
TLDR
It is suggested that, when circumstances dictate, proximal positioning of the acetabular component without lateral displacement can give an acceptable result in cemented total hip-replacement procedures.
...
1
2
3
...