• DOI:10.1056/NEJM199801153380301
• Corpus ID: 6384689

Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

@article{Rao1998EffectOC,
  title={Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.},
  author={Patrick M. Rao and James T. Rhea and Robert A. Novelline and Amy A. Mostafavi and Charles J. McCabe},
  journal={The New England journal of medicine},
  year={1998},
  volume={338 3},
  pages={
          141-6
        }
}

• P. M. Rao, J. Rhea, +2 authors C. McCabe
• Published 15 January 1998
• Medicine
• The New England journal of medicine

BACKGROUND
In patients with clinically suspected appendicitis, computed tomography (CT) is diagnostically accurate. However, the effect of routine CT of the appendix on the treatment of such patients and the use of hospital resources is unknown.

METHODS
We performed appendiceal CT on 100 consecutive patients in the emergency department who, on the basis of history, physical examination, and laboratory results, were to be hospitalized for observation for suspected appendicitis or for urgent appendectomy. Outcomes were determined at surgery and by pathological examination in 59 patients, and by clinical follow-up two months later in 41 patients. Treatment plans made before CT were compared with the patients' actual treatment. We also determined the costs of surgery that revealed no appendicitis (from data on 61 patients), one day of observation in the hospital (from data on 350 patient-days in patients with suspected appendicitis), and appendiceal CT (from data on all pelvic CT examinations in 1996).

RESULTS
Fifty-three patients had appendicitis, and 47 did not. The interpretations of the appendiceal CT scans were 98 percent accurate. The results of CT led to changes in the treatment of 59 patients. These changes resulted in the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients, admission to the hospital for observation in 18 patients, admission to the hospital for observation before necessary appendectomy in 21 patients, and admission to the hospital for observation before the diagnosis of other conditions by CT in 11 patients. The effects of performing appendiceal CT on the use of hospital resources included the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients (for a savings of $47,281) and the prevention of unnecessary hospital admission for 50 patient-days (for a savings of $20,250). After the cost of 100 appendiceal CT studies ($22,800) was subtracted, the overall savings was $447 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS
Routine appendiceal CT performed in patients who present with suspected appendicitis improves patient care and reduces the use of hospital resources.