Editorial: use of surgical databases in urogynaecology

@article{Abdelrahman2019EditorialUO,
  title={Editorial: use of surgical databases in urogynaecology},
  author={Abdelmageed Abdelrahman and Ashleigh Moore and Ruben D Trochez},
  journal={International Urogynecology Journal},
  year={2019},
  volume={30},
  pages={851-852}
}
In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of surgical databases to record the outcomes of surgery in many specialties. Urogynaecology has seen the development of at least two large-scale databases in the last two decades. This editorial addresses the rationale for a surgical database in urogynaecology, how the database works, the advantages and drawbacks of this form of data collection, usage, and the potential it has to become a compulsory and perhaps essential element of… 

Topics from this paper

Authors’ reply to letter from Schiøtz et al. on “Use of surgical databases in urogynaecology”
TLDR
It is encouraging to learn that there is an established quality urogynaecology registry in Norway and that its use is compulsory, and that it has achieved the highest possible quality rating in Norway.
Re: Abdelrahman A, Moore A, Trochez R. Use of surgical databases in urogynaecology
TLDR
The editorial ‘Use of surgical databases in urogynaecology’ by Abdelrahman, Moore and Trochez agrees wholeheartedly that good quality surgical registries are needed and that compulsory registries ensure better data quality, but was somewhat surprised to see one of the oldest registries, The Norwegian Female incontinence registry, was not mentioned in the editorial.
Minimum standards for reporting outcomes of surgery in urogynaecology
The IUGA special interest group (SIG) identified a need for a minimum data set (MDS) to inform outcome measurements to be included and simplify data capture and standardise reporting for data
Non‐mesh surgery for stress urinary incontinence
Following the pause on the use of mesh, women are opting more for non‐mesh‐based options for stress urinary continence (SUI) surgery. Even after any re‐introduction of mesh procedures, women may

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
The BSUG national database: concept, design, implementation and beyond
TLDR
The British Society of Urogynaecology allows members to enter and access pre‐, intra‐ and postoperative data relating to any anti‐incontinence and/or prolapse procedure onto the database, a useful tool for audit, clinical governance, personal development and appraisal.
Danish Urogynaecological Database
TLDR
The Danish Urogynaecological Database is established in order to ensure high quality of treatment for patients undergoing urogynecological surgery and is used as a quality monitoring tool by the hospitals and in a number of scientific studies of specific uroGynecological topics, broader epidemiological topics, and the use of patient reported outcome measures.
HQIP
  • British Society of Urogynaecology. 2014. http://bsug.org.uk/news-details/bsug-audit-database%E2% 80%93hqip/43/12/0. Accessed on 27 March
  • 2018
  • Obstet Gynaecol
  • 2013