Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems

@article{Cusack2007EconomicIA,
  title={Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems},
  author={Thomas R. Cusack and Torben Iversen and David Soskice},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  year={2007},
  volume={101},
  pages={373 - 391}
}
The standard explanation for the choice of electoral institutions, building on Rokkan's seminal work, is that proportional representation (PR) was adopted by a divided right to defend its class interests against a rising left. But new evidence shows that PR strengthens the left and redistribution, and we argue the standard view is wrong historically, analytically, and empirically. We offer a radically different explanation. Integrating two opposed interpretations of PR—minimum winning… 

Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems

Protocorporatist West European countries in which economic interests were collectively organized adopted PR in the first quarter of the twentieth century, whereas liberal countries in which economic

The Existential Threat: Varieties of Socialism and the Origins of Electoral Systems in Early Democracies

The origins of electoral systems in early democracies have received a great deal of attention in recent years, as scholars seek to explain why at the time of suffrage expansion some countries adopted

The politics of electoral reforms : the origins of proportional representation in Brazil and the Electoral Code of 1932

Electoral systems are institutions created to process political conflict. In this chapter we focus on the causes leading to proportional representation (PR) adoption in the Brazilian 1932 Electoral

The Adoption of Proportional Representation

The debate between economic and political explanations of the adoption of proportional representation (PR) has yielded mixed results. We reexamine this debate and argue that one has to take the

Economic globalization and the change of electoral rules

Abstract This paper takes up an argument from Ronald Rogowski about the “natural affinity” between trade and an electoral system with proportional representation. We draw on literature on the

Electoral reform, values and party self-interest

It is often taken for granted that parties support electoral reform because they anticipate seat payoffs from the psychological and mechanical effects of the new electoral system. Although some

Electoral Reform Under Limited Party Competition: The Adoption of Proportional Representation in Latin America

Abstract The adoption of proportional representation in Western Europe has been portrayed as either a defensive or an offensive competition strategy used by established parties to deal with the rise

Constructing Industrial Order in the Center of the American Economy: How Electoral Competition and Social Collaboration Evolved in Twentieth-Century New York

Comparative studies of capitalist political economies have settled on a new understanding of how historical choices about electoral rules were constitutive of the current varieties of capitalism that

Parties, Legislators, and the Origins of Proportional Representation

A prominent line of theories holds that proportional representation (PR) was introduced in many European democracies by a fragmented bloc of conservative parties seeking to preserve their legislative

Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy

The knowledge economy, deindustrialization, and the decline of Fordism have undermined the economic complementarities that once existed between skilled and semiskilled workers. The result has
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 124 REFERENCES

Trade and the variety of democratic institutions

Students of comparative politics have long acknowledged the importance of such institutional factors as electoral systems, parliamentary versus presidential rule, and the strength of parties; but

France: Reform-mongering Between Majority Runoff and Proportionality

For perhaps no other country do we have so much ‘evidence of the politician’s belief in the importance of electoral systems as political weapons… Between 1870 and 1940 the parliamentary electoral

Electoral institutions,cleavage structures,and the number of parties

Theory: A classic question in political science concerns what determines the number of parties that compete in a given polity. Broadly speaking, there are two approaches to answering this question,

It's Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (Or, Duverger's Laws Upside Down)

This article presents, discusses and tests the hypothesis that it is the number of parties that can explain the choice of electoral systems, rather than the other way around. Already-existing

Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century

The authors present an alternative to power resource theory as an approach to the study of distribution and redistribution. While they agree that partisanship and union power are important, they

Spain: from Civil War to Proportional Representation

The choice of a majoritarian electoral system by the leaders of the Spanish Second Republic established in 1931 can explain the high and increasing levels of political polarization which eventually

Electoral systems and the politics of coalitions : why some democracies redistribute more than others

We develop a general model of redistribution and use it to account for the remarkable variance in government redistribution across democracies. We show that the electoral system plays a key role

The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choice

It is on account of the importance of the consequences of the electoral system, especially on the number of political parties and the political composition of assemblies and governments, that the

Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties

Recent events leading to the importation of democratic ideas and ideals by previously totalitarian states increase our interest in the ways in which electoral institutions influence party systems.

To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice

In September 1864, the Association Internationale pour le Progres des Sciences Sociales met in Amsterdam to examine the system of proportional representation (PR) which had just been proposed by
...