Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants.

@article{Morgan2013EarlyTF,
  title={Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants.},
  author={Jessie Anne Morgan and Sarah Bombell and William McGuire},
  journal={The Cochrane database of systematic reviews},
  year={2013},
  volume={3},
  pages={CD000504}
}
BACKGROUND The introduction of enteral feeds for very preterm (< 32 weeks) or very low birth weight (< 1500 grams) infants is often delayed due to concern that early introduction may not be tolerated and may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis. However, prolonged enteral fasting may diminish the functional adaptation of the immature gastrointestinal tract and extend the need for parenteral nutrition with its attendant infectious and metabolic risks. Trophic feeding, giving infants… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 5 times. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 34 extracted citations

Nutrition for the Extremely Preterm Infant.

Clinics in perinatology • 2017
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Nutritional support for premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Critical care nursing clinics of North America • 2014
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 22 references

O’Donnel CPF. How minimal is “minimal” enteral feeding?. Archives of Disease in Childhood

SM McHale 2010 McHale, R McCarthy
Fetal and Neonatal Edition • 2010

The fear of necrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth in preterm infants--an opinion

D Branski, ES. Shinwell
Flidel-Rimon • 2006

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…