Early invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a substudy of the OASIS 5 trial and a meta-analysis of previous randomized trials.

@article{Swahn2012EarlyIC,
  title={Early invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a substudy of the OASIS 5 trial and a meta-analysis of previous randomized trials.},
  author={Eva E Swahn and Joakim Alfredsson and Rizwan Afzal and Andrzej J Budaj and Susan Chrolavicius and Keith A. A. Fox and Sanjit Jolly and Shamir R. Mehta and Robbert J. de Winter and Salim Yusuf},
  journal={European heart journal},
  year={2012},
  volume={33 1},
  pages={51-60}
}
AIMS The aim of this study was to compare benefits and risks of a routine invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS We randomly assigned 184 women, either to a routine or to a selective invasive strategy as a substudy to the OASIS 5 trial, who were followed for 2 years. Meta-analysis of data from previous randomized trials was also done. There were no significant differences between the two treatment… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 20 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 19 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…