Early goal-directed therapy vs usual care in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

@article{Rusconi2015EarlyGT,
  title={Early goal-directed therapy vs usual care in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
  author={A. M. Rusconi and Ilaria Bossi and J. G. Lampard and M. Szava-Kovats and A. Bellone and E. Lang},
  journal={Internal and Emergency Medicine},
  year={2015},
  volume={10},
  pages={731-743}
}
  • A. M. Rusconi, Ilaria Bossi, +3 authors E. Lang
  • Published 2015
  • Medicine
  • Internal and Emergency Medicine
  • Sepsis is a common and high-burden healthcare problem with a mortality exceeding 20 % in severe sepsis and nearly 50 % when septic shock is present. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is recommended by sepsis guidelines as the standard of care following a landmark study by Rivers et al. alongside other observational studies. Three recent randomized controlled trials have questioned the Rivers’ results. The objective of our systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of EGDT in reducing… CONTINUE READING

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.
    • 87
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 58 REFERENCES
    Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
    • 27,348
    • PDF
    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    • 29,134
    • PDF
    Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008
    • 3,685
    • PDF
    Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock
    • 2,897
    • PDF