• Corpus ID: 51829045

EXIT POLLING AND RACIAL BLOC VOTING: COMBINING INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL AND R × C ECOLOGICAL DATA BY D. JAMES GREINER

@inproceedings{Greiner2010EXITPA,
  title={EXIT POLLING AND RACIAL BLOC VOTING: COMBINING INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL AND R × C ECOLOGICAL DATA BY D. JAMES GREINER},
  author={D. James Greiner and Kevin M. Quinn},
  year={2010}
}
Despite its shortcomings, cross-level or ecological inference remains a necessary part of some areas of quantitative inference, including in United States voting rights litigation. Ecological inference suffers from a lack of identification that, most agree, is best addressed by incorporating individuallevel data into the model. In this paper we test the limits of such an incorporation by attempting it in the context of drawing inferences about racial voting patterns using a combination of an… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES

Exit Polling and Racial Bloc Voting: Combining Individual-Level and R X C Ecological Data

The hybrid estimator offers substantial benefits by enabling substantive inferences about voting patterns not practicably available without its use, and is compared with a pure ecological estimator, pure survey estimators using various sampling schemes and the hybrid.

Cross-Level Inference

In the last few years, new disputes have erupted over the use of group averages from census areas or voting districts to draw inferences about individual social behaviour. Social scientists, policy

Ecological Inference in Voting Rights Act Disputes: Where are We Now, and Where Do We Want to Be?

Recent developments in law and in quantitative methods have combined to place greater emphasis on coherent and accurate techniques of drawing inferences about racial voting patterns in Voting Rights

Aggregate Data, Ecological Regression, and Voting Transitions

Abstract Voting data typically comprise the marginal distributions of votes cast at two successive elections. The fact that these obtain separately for many voting precincts or areas enables one to

Alleviating Ecological Bias in Voter Turnout Models (and other Generalized Linear Models) with Optimal Subsample Design

In this paper, we illustrate that combining ecological data with subsample data in situations in which a generalized linear model (GLM) is appropriate provides two main benefits. First, by including

Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables

Summary.  A fundamental problem in many disciplines, including political science, sociology and epidemiology, is the examination of the association between two binary variables across a series of 2 ×

No More Wilder Effect, Never a Whitman Effect: When and Why Polls Mislead about Black and Female Candidates

The 2008 election renewed interest in the Wilder or Bradley effect, the gap between the share of survey respondents expressing support for a candidate and the candidate's vote share. Using new data

Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: The R×C Case

The proposed Bayesian model extends the binomial‐beta hierarchical model developed by King, Rosen and Tanner (1999) from the 2×2 case to the R×C case, and employs Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.

Models, assumptions and model checking in ecological regressions

Ecological regression is based on assumptions that are untestable from aggregate data. However, these assumptions seem more questionable in some applications than in others. There has been some

Alleviating linear ecological bias and optimal design with subsample data

It is illustrated that combining ecological data with subsample data in situations in which a linear model is appropriate provides three main benefits, and that optimal subsampling schemes (conditional on the ecological data) can provide good precision with only a fraction of the observations.