Dynamic logic for belief revision

@article{Benthem2007DynamicLF,
  title={Dynamic logic for belief revision},
  author={Johan van Benthem},
  journal={J. Appl. Non Class. Logics},
  year={2007},
  volume={17},
  pages={129-155}
}
  • J. Benthem
  • Published 2007
  • Philosophy
  • J. Appl. Non Class. Logics
We show how belief revision can be treated systematically in the format of dynamicepistemic logic, when operators of conditional belief are added. The core engine consists of definable update rules for changing plausibility relations between worlds, which have been proposed independently in the dynamic-epistemic literature on preference change. Our analysis yields two new types of modal result. First, we obtain complete logics for concrete mechanisms of belief revision, based on compositional… 

Figures from this paper

Belief revision and dynamic logic
We explore belief change policies in a modal dynamic logic that explicitly delineates knowledge, belief, plausibility and the dynamics of these notions. Taking a Kripke semantics counterpart to Grove
Belief Revision and Dynamic Logic
  • P. GirardH. Rott
  • Philosophy
    Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics
  • 2014
TLDR
A Kripke semantics counterpart to Grove semantics for AGM as a starting point, belief in a basic modal language containing epistemic and doxastic modal- ities is analysed and some philosophical presuppositions underlying various modelling assumptions commonly made are critically discussed.
Generalized Iterated Belief Change in Dynamic Epistemic Logic
TLDR
This work investigates how Dynamic Preference Logic, a logic in the DEL family, can be used to characterise properties of dynamic belief change operators, focusing on well-known postulates of iterated belief change.
Bringing Belief Base Change into Dynamic Epistemic Logic
TLDR
This work investigates changes in the semantics of Dynamic Preference Logic that give rise to an appropriate syntactic representation for its models that allow us to represent and reason about iterated belief base change in this logic.
Belief revision and projection in the epistemic situation calculus
Belief revision in a temporal framework
TLDR
This work focuses on belief revision and proposes a temporal framework that allows for iterated revision and moves from one logic to the next by adding one or more axioms and shows that the corresponding logic captures more stringent notions of minimal belief revision.
Propositional Dynamic Logic as a Logic of Belief Revision
TLDR
This paper shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent belief revision and shows that the update part of this logic is more expressive than either that of LCC or that of doxastic/epistemic PDL with a belief change modality.
Dynamic Preference Logic as a Logic of Belief Change
TLDR
This work investigates how Dynamic Preference Logic, a logic in the DEL family, can be used to characterise properties of dynamic belief change operators, focusing on well-known postulates of iterated belief change.
Simple Hyperintensional Belief Revision
I present a possible worlds semantics for a hyperintensional belief revision operator, which reduces the logical idealization of cognitive agents affecting similar operators in doxastic and epistemic
Iterated Belief Base Revision: A Dynamic Epistemic Logic Approach
TLDR
This work investigates how priority graphs, a syntactic representation of preference relations deeply connected to prioritised bases, can be used to characterise belief change operators, focusing on well-known postulates of Iterated Belief Change.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 71 REFERENCES
The Logic of Conditional Doxastic Actions : A theory of dynamic multi-agent belief revision
We present a logic of conditional doxastic actions, obtained by incorporating ideas from belief revision theory into the usual dynamic logic of epistemic actions. We do this by extending to actions
Dynamic logic of preference upgrade
TLDR
A complete logic of knowledge update plus preference upgrade that works with dynamic-epistemic-style reduction axioms that can model changing obligations, conflicting commands, or ‘regret' and is concluded that the dynamic framework is viable, while admitting a further extension to more numerical ‘utility update'.
A Combined System for Update Logic and Belief Revision
TLDR
This paper proposes a logical system combining the update logic of A. Baltag, L. Moss and S. Solecki with the belief revision theory as conceived by C. Alchouron, P. Gardenfors and D. Mackinson viewed from the point of view of W. Spohn.
Irrevocable Belief Revision in Dynamic Doxastic Logic
TLDR
A new modeling for belief revision that is what the authors term irrevocable is presented, which captures some features of suppositional reasoning, and is couched in terms of dynamic doxastic logic.
Dynamic Belief Revision over Multi-Agent Plausibility Models
In this paper, we develop a notion of doxastic actions, general enough to cover all examples of communication actions and most other belief-changing actions encountered in the literature, but also
Common knowledge in update logics
TLDR
This work investigates the expressive power of public announcement logic with relativized common knowledge, and presents reduction axioms that give a detailed account of the dynamics of common knowledge in some major communication types.
The Undecidability of Iterated Modal Relativization
TLDR
It is shown that for three fragments of the logic of iterated relativization and transitive closure, the satisfiability problems are fi1 Σ11–complete, and the question of whether a sentence in these fragments has a finite (tree) model is fi0 Σ01–complete.
Belief Revision From the Point of View of Doxastic Logic
TLDR
Maarten de Rijke's idea is taken further, addressing the question whether there is a particular doxastic or epistemic logic implicit in AGM.
...
...