Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics

@article{Skyrms1987DynamicCA,
  title={Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics},
  author={Brian Skyrms},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1987},
  volume={54},
  pages={1 - 20}
}
  • B. Skyrms
  • Published 1 March 1987
  • Mathematics
  • Philosophy of Science
The question of coherence of rules for changing degrees of belief in the light of new evidence is studied, with special attention being given to cases in which evidence is uncertain. Belief change by the rule of conditionalization on an appropriate proposition and belief change by "probability kinematics" on an appropriate partition are shown to have like status. 
MERGING OF OPINIONS AND PROBABILITY KINEMATICS
TLDR
Several theorems on the asymptotic behavior of subjective probabilities are proven and show that while a consensus nearly always emerges in important special cases, sustained rational disagreement can be expected in many other situations. Expand
The Theory of Fallible Probability and The Dynamics of Degrees of Belief
This monograph is an account of the theory of fallible probability and of the dynamics of degrees of belief. It discusses the first order subjective theory in which first order degrees of belief areExpand
The kinematics of belief and desire
TLDR
This paper aims to connect Bayesian decision theory and probability kinematics by developing kinematical models for the study of preference change and practical deliberation by creating a tentative model of pratical deliberation. Expand
Ampliative inference: on choosing a probability distribution
TLDR
The discussion is largely tutorial although a substantive hypothesis is also advanced, and some psychological and normative questions that arise about this kind of reasoning are considered. Expand
Coherently updating degrees of belief: Radical Probabilism, the generalization of Bayes’ Theorem and its consequences on evidence evaluation
The Bayesian perspective is based on conditioning related to reported evidence that is considered to be certain. What is called ‘Radical Probabilism’ replaces such an extreme view by introducingExpand
The structure of radical probabilism
Does the philosophy of Radical Probabilism have enough structure to enable it to address fundamental epistemological questions? The requirement of dynamic coherence provides the structure for radicalExpand
Diachronic Coherence and Radical Probabilism
  • B. Skyrms
  • Mathematics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • 2006
The question of diachronic coherence, coherence of degrees of belief across time, is investigated within the context of Richard Jeffrey’s radical probabilism. Diachronic coherence is taken asExpand
Conditionalizing on Knowledge
A theory of evidential probability is developed from two assumptions:(1) the evidential probability of a proposition is its probability conditional on the total evidence;(2) one's total evidence isExpand
Probability and time
TLDR
It is obtained that using conditioning is normative, in the imprecise case, only if one establishes future behavioural commitments at the same time of current beliefs, which shows in particular that temporal consistency does not preclude changes of mind. Expand
Forthcoming in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science SPEED-OPTIMAL INDUCTION AND DYNAMIC COHERENCE
A standard way to challenge convergence-based accounts of inductive success is to claim that they are too weak to constrain inductive inferences in the short run. We respond to such a challenge byExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
Is There a Dutch Book Argument for Probability Kinematics?
Dutch Book arguments have been presented for static belief systems and for belief change by conditionalization. An argument is given here that a rule for belief change which under certain conditionsExpand
Conditionalization, Observation, and Change of Preference
TLDR
This chapter discusses the justification of condition (ii) from the point of view of a frequency interpretation of probability or reasonable degree of belief, and discusses the connection between change of belief and change of preference. Expand
The Prevision of a Prevision
Abstract We prove that the result EX = E(E(X | Y)) is true, for bounded X, when the usual concept of conditional expectation or prevision is replaced by an alternative definition reflecting anExpand
Updating Subjective Probability
Abstract Jeffrey's rule for revising a probability P to a new probability P* based on new probabilities P* (Ei ) on a partition {Ei } i = 1 n is P*(A) = Σ P(A| Ei ) P* (Ei ). Jeffrey's rule isExpand
Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability
  • I. Hacking
  • Computer Science
  • Philosophy of Science
  • 1967
A person required to risk money on a remote digit of π would, in order to comply fully with the theory [of personal probability] have to compute that digit, though this would really be wasteful ifExpand
Belief and Will
absolutely right or wrong? because no moral legislation has its basis in pure ethics. But the pertinent questions are: Will prohibitory legislation, if enacted, do harm or good ? Will it educate theExpand
Causal Necessity Appendix 2Higher-Order Degrees of Belief
  • Causal Necessity Appendix 2Higher-Order Degrees of Belief
  • 1980
Causal Necessity. New Haven: Yale University Press, Appendix 2. .(1980b), "Higher-Order
  • 1980
This includes some other virtues, in addition to dynamic coherence
  • Journal of Philosophy
  • 1973
...
1
2
...