Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

@article{Evans2008DualprocessingAO,
  title={Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.},
  author={Jonathan Evans},
  journal={Annual review of psychology},
  year={2008},
  volume={59},
  pages={
          255-78
        }
}
  • Jonathan Evans
  • Published 8 January 2008
  • Psychology
  • Annual review of psychology
This article reviews a diverse set of proposals for dual processing in higher cognition within largely disconnected literatures in cognitive and social psychology. All these theories have in common the distinction between cognitive processes that are fast, automatic, and unconscious and those that are slow, deliberative, and conscious. A number of authors have recently suggested that there may be two architecturally (and evolutionarily) distinct cognitive systems underlying these dual-process… 

Tables from this paper

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

  • Jonathan EvansK. Stanovich
  • Psychology, Biology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2013
It is argued that the dual-processing distinction is supported by much recent evidence in cognitive science.

Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning

Dual-process theories hold that there are two distinct processing modes available for many cognitive tasks: one (type 1) that is fast, automatic and non-conscious, and another (type 2) that is slow,

The duality of mind: an historical perspective

[About the book] This book explores the idea that we have two minds - automatic, unconscious, and fast, the other controlled, conscious, and slow. In recent years there has been great interest in

Dennett’s Dual-Process Theory of Reasoning

Content and Consciousness (CC in the other it refers to conscious mental acts involved in problem solving. In retrospect, this distinction anticipates the dual-process theories proposed by many

Memory, reasoning, and categorization: parallels and common mechanisms

It is argued that there is broad scope for crossover between the methods and theories developed for each task, and progress in all three of these fields will be expedited by further investigation of the many commonalities between these tasks.

Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.

This work provides convergent arguments and evidence for a unified theoretical approach to both intuitive and deliberative judgments, and adumbrates a unified approach that specifies the critical dimensions on which judgmental situations may vary and the environmental conditions under which rules can be expected to be successful.

Dual-process theories of reasoning: The test of development

A cognitive-representational account of intuitive moral judgment: Effects of typicality and accessibility

In this article, it is argued that intuitive judgments of immoral events result from an automatic process where perceived events are matched against mentally represented event prototypes. The

Dual-Processing Perspectives

Dual-process theories propose that human behavior (including communication) is the combined result of two qualitatively different processing mechanisms, one relatively fast, automatic, and
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 160 REFERENCES

An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

  • M. Osman
  • Biology
    Psychonomic bulletin & review
  • 2004
This article evaluates the arguments and the evidence from a select number of key tasks that have been supportive of dual-reasoning theorists’ proposals and argues in favor of the alternative framework, which attempts to unify the different forms of reasoning identified by dual-process theorists under a single system.

In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning

A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness

  • F. Toates
  • Psychology, Biology
    Consciousness and Cognition
  • 2006

Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.

One of the driving forces in social cognition has been the goal of understanding the mental mechanisms that can produce the large array of paradoxical findings that have excited social psychology

Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes.

The authors consider the common philosophical commitment to determinism by both schools of thought, and how the radical behaviorists' thesis of the determined nature of higher mental processes is being pursued today in social cognition research on automaticity.

Dual Processing in Reasoning

Human reasoning has been characterized as an interplay between an automatic belief-based system and a demanding logic-based reasoning system. The present study tested a fundamental claim about the

The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.

Distinctions have been proposed between systems of reasoning for centuries. This article distills properties shared by many of these distinctions and characterizes the resulting systems in light of

Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.

Evidence is reviewed which suggests that there may be little or no direct introspective access to higher order cognitive processes. Subjects are sometimes (a) unaware of the existence of a stimulus

The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations.

This chapter defends the view that thought processes might be modular too, and argues that perceptual and linguistic decoding processes are modular, much more than on the alleged nonmodularity of thought.

Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance.

The quadruple process model proposed and tested in the present article quantitatively disentangles the influences of 4 distinct processes on implicit task performance: the likelihood that automatic bias is activated by a stimulus; that a correct response can be determined; thatautomatic bias is overcome; and that, in the absence of other information, a guessing bias drives responses.
...