Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis

@article{Nutt2010DrugHI,
  title={Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis},
  author={D. Nutt and L. King and L. Phillips and on behalf of the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={2010},
  volume={376},
  pages={1558-1565}
}
BACKGROUND Proper assessment of the harms caused by the misuse of drugs can inform policy makers in health, policing, and social care. [...] Key Method Drugs were scored out of 100 points, and the criteria were weighted to indicate their relative importance. FINDINGS MCDA modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals (part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively), whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others (46, 21, and 17…Expand Abstract
987 Citations

Topics from this paper.

Questioning the method and utility of ranking drug harms in drug policy.
  • 34
  • PDF
Toward an Improved Multi-Criteria Drug Harm Assessment Process and Evidence-Based Drug Policies
  • 1
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
The Australian drug harms ranking study
  • 13
European rating of drug harms
  • 74
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Estimating the Harms of Nicotine-Containing Products Using the MCDA Approach
  • 234
  • PDF
Drugs and harm to society
  • 1
Experienced Drug Users Assess the Relative Harms and Benefits of Drugs: A Web-Based Survey
  • 27
  • PDF

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Nuclear risk management on stage: a decision analysis perspective on the UK's Committee on Radioactive Waste Management.
  • 47
Brain science, addiction and drugs
  • 28
  • PDF
Living with Risk
  • 236