Draining the pond: why Singer’s defense of the duty to aid the world’s poor is self-defeating

  title={Draining the pond: why Singer’s defense of the duty to aid the world’s poor is self-defeating},
  author={Anton Marko{\vc}},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
Peter Singer’s defense of the duty to aid the world’s poor by the pond analogy is self-defeating. It cannot be both true that you ought to save the drowning child from a pond at the expense of ruining your shoes and that you ought to aid the world’s poor if you thereby do not sacrifice anything of comparable moral importance. Taking the latter principle seriously would lead you to let the child in front of you drown whenever you could thereby save more children in the developing world. Though… Expand
1 Citations
Relief from Rescue
Moral extremists argue for highly demanding duties of beneficence on the ground that accepting a more moderate position commits us to denying the common-sense moral intuition elicited by easy rescueExpand


The Ethics of Assistance: Moral limits on the demands of beneficence?
If you came upon a small child drowning in a pond, you ought to save the child even at considerable cost and risk to yourself. In 1972 Peter Singer observed that inhabitants of affluentExpand
Beneficence, Duty and Distance
According to Peter Singer, virtually all of us would be forced by adequate reflection on our own convictions to embrace a radical conclusion about giving. The following principle, he says, is "Expand
The Fallacy Of Philanthropy
Should we stop spending money on things we do not really need and send the money instead to groups that aid victims of absolute poverty? Garrett Cullity and Peter Unger have given renewed vigor toExpand
Sometimes there is nothing wrong with letting a child drown
Peter Singer argues that we�re obligated to donate our entire expendable income to aid organizations. One premiss of his argument is "If it is in your power to prevent something bad from happening,Expand
Doing and Allowing Harm
Doing harm seems much harder to justify than merely allowing harm. If a boulder is rushing towards Bob, you may refuse to save Bob's life by driving your car into the path of the boulder if doing soExpand
A Refutation of Ordinary Morality
The jacket of this book announces that it is the first volume in the Oxford Ethics Series edited by Derek Parfit and states that the aim of the series is "to make undeniable progress" inExpand
Living high and letting die : our illusion of innocence
By contributing a few hundred dollars to a charity like UNICEF, a prosperous person can ensure that fewer poor children die, and that more will live reasonably long, worthwhile lives. Even whenExpand
Utilitarianism and beyond: Contractualism and utilitarianism
Utilitarianism occupies a central place in the moral philosophy of our time. It is not the view which most people hold; certainly there are very few who would claim to be act utilitarians. But for aExpand
Kant and Moral Demandingness
We discuss the demandingness of Kant’s ethics. Whilst previous discussions of this issue focused on imperfect duties, our first aim is to show that Kantian demandingness is especially salient in theExpand
Islands in a sea of obligation: Limits of the duty to rescue
John Harris muses, "If we sometimes take comfort from the reflection that no man is an island, we may sometimes ponder just how, or how far, we are involved in mankind."2 I cite Harris's musing notExpand