Doubting Driverless Dilemmas

  title={Doubting Driverless Dilemmas},
  author={Julian De Freitas and Sam E Anthony and Andrea Censi and George A. Alvarez},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  pages={1284 - 1288}
The alarm has been raised on so-called driverless dilemmas, in which autonomous vehicles will need to make high-stakes ethical decisions on the road. We argue that these arguments are too contrived to be of practical use, are an inappropriate method for making decisions on issues of safety, and should not be used to inform engineering or policy. 

Figures from this paper

Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles

A positive account is developed of how trolley cases can inform the ethics of automated vehicles and four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected.

From driverless dilemmas to more practical commonsense tests for automated vehicles

This work examines, at a high level, how to test the common sense of an AV, and explains how to substantially change the premises and features of these dilemmas in order to lay the foundations for a more practical and relevant framework that tests driving common sense as an integral part of road rules testing.

Ethical dilemmas are really important to potential adopters of autonomous vehicles

The results showed that people associated EDs with the highest risk and considered EDs as the most important issue to address as compared to the other technical, legal and ethical issues facing AVs.

A Deeper Look at Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: An Integrative Ethical Decision-Making Framework to Explain Moral Pluralism

This framework describes that ethical behavioral intentions that lead to decisions in the AV moral dilemma are not fixed, but are based on how an individual perceives the seriousness of the situation, which is shaped by their personal moral philosophy.

Deliberately prejudiced self-driving vehicles elicit the most outrage

It is found that people are more outraged by AVs that kill discriminately than indiscriminately, and there may be more reason to depict and program AVs as egalitarian, insofar as the public is concerned.

Ethics of Artificial Intelligence Demarcations

A set of key demarcations are presented, particularly important when discussing ethical and societal issues of current AI research and applications, to facilitate much-needed discussions on ethics on current AI technologies and research.

The role of utilitarianism, self-safety, and technology in the acceptance of self-driving cars

The empirical outcome of this work shows that the three investigated factors contribute to the societal acceptance of self-driving cars, with technology being the major contributor while the ethical aspects (self-safety and utilitarianism) follow.

Selfish or Utilitarian Automated Vehicles? Deontological Evaluation and Public Acceptance

ABSTRACT This research involves a controversial topic in the public sphere: should automated vehicles (AVs) be programmed with selfish algorithms to protect their passengers at all costs or

'Solving for X?' Towards a Problem-Finding Framework to Ground Long-Term Governance Strategies for Artificial Intelligence

Change is hardly a new feature in human affairs. Yet something has begun to change in change. In the face of a range of emerging, complex, and interconnected global challenges, society’s collective



Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars

If motor vehicles are to be truly autonomous and able to operate responsibly on our roads, they will need to replicate—or do better than—the human decision-making process. But some decisions are more

Never Mind the Trolley: The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles in Mundane Situations

Trolley cases are widely considered central to the ethics of autonomous vehicles. We caution against this by identifying four problems. (1) Trolley cases, given technical limitations, rest on

Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting

This essay will defend the somewhat contra-intuitive claim that people would not be willing to use an automated car that might sacrifice themselves in a dilemma situation, and ask whether every driver should have the choice to select his own personal ethics setting (PES).

Our driverless dilemma

It is shown that people generally approve of cars programmed to minimize the total amount of harm, even at the expense of their passengers, but are not enthusiastic about riding in such “utilitarian” cars—that is, autonomous vehicles that are, in certain emergency situations, programmed to sacrifice their passengers for the greater good.

The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles

Even though participants approve of autonomous vehicles that might sacrifice passengers to save others, respondents would prefer not to ride in such vehicles, and regulating for utilitarian algorithms may paradoxically increase casualties by postponing the adoption of a safer technology.

From public preferences to ethical policy

Preference should inform the design of autonomous vehicles only after being screened for bias and only to the degree to which they match major ethical theories.

A Voting-Based System for Ethical Decision Making

The proposed approach is to learn a model of societal preferences, and, when faced with a specific ethical dilemma at runtime, efficiently aggregate those preferences to identify a desirable choice.

On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Cars

A white-box, interpretable, mathematical model for safety assurance, which the authors call-Sensitive Safety (RSS), and a design of a system that adheres to the safety assurance requirements and is scalable to millions of cars.

A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles

This paper points out the tradeoff between model completeness and real-time constraints, and the fact that the choice of a risk assessment method is influenced by the selected motion model.

The Trolley Problem

Some years ago, Philippa Foot drew attention to an extraordinarily interesting problem." Suppose you are the driver of a trolley. The trolley rounds a bend, and there come into view ahead five track