Double Objects Again

@article{Beck2004DoubleOA,
  title={Double Objects Again},
  author={Sigrid Beck and Kyle B. Johnson},
  journal={Linguistic Inquiry},
  year={2004},
  volume={35},
  pages={97-123}
}
In this article, we explore the interaction of the verb again with double object constructions and the corresponding NP+PP constructions. The restitutive reading that again gives rise to in combination with these predicates supports an analysis of double object constructions according to which they contain a small clause with a head predicate HAVE, and an analysis of the corresponding NP+PP constructions that is not transformationally related and varies according to the verb contained in the… 

Syntactic Neutralization in Double Object Constructions

This article synthesizes the ‘‘alternative projection’’ view of the alternation between the DP + DP and DP + PP complement frames of English double object verbs, according to which the alternants are

There and Back Again: A Semantic Analysis

A cross-linguistic survey of the interpretations that decomposition adverbs like again permit and it is argued that in these languages the PP can function as a result phrase.

THE DATIVE ALTERNATION AS A-MOVEMENT OUT OF A SMALL CLAUSE CP

It is argued that every movement across a CP-boundary is constrained by the Phase Impenetrability Condition (PIC), from which a syntactic solution is given to the question why certain double object verbs lack the V NP-PP variant.

In Support of the PHAVE Analysis of the Double Object Construction

Pylkkänen (2002, 2008) and Bruening (2010a) present several arguments against the ‘‘small clause’’ approach to the double object construction in English, building on the predictions that that

Chapter 2 Russian datives again : On the ( im ) possibility of the small clause analysis

In this paper I use the interpretation of the repetitive adverb opjat’ ‘again’ in Russian to argue that ditransitive structures in this language do not involve a small clause structure (Kayne 1984;

Implicit arguments in English double object constructions

This work shows that implicit arguments are not projected as NPs in the syntax, contra works like Landau (2010), and suggests that the identity condition on ellipsis makes reference to maximal projections, not to heads as in Rudin (2019).

Resultative constructions : cross-linguistic variation and the syntax-semantics interface

It is argued that the structural difference between the two types of resultative constructions also mirrors the difference in the type of semantic operations used to interpret these constructions.

Syntactic Representation of Dative and Double Object Structures

The aim of this study is to present a unified analysis of the dative structures. The study relies on data from English and Arabic that support “the single meaning approach”. According to this

There and back again: An acquisition study

ABSTRACT When again modifies an English goal-PP construction, the sentence is ambiguous between a repetitive and a restitutive reading. Interestingly, languages vary in whether their counterpart to
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 88 REFERENCES

Object positions

Nominals precede other verbal complements in English. This paper argues against accounts of this fact based on an adjacency requirement on Case assignment, and proposes instead that (1) main verbs in

Possession and the double object construction

It is argued that double-object verbs decompose into two heads, an external-argumentselecting CAUSE predicate (vCAUSE) and a prepositional element, PHAVE, which does not form part of the inventory of morphosyntactic primitives of these languages.

Against Lexical Decomposition in Syntax

This work will argue that the partial resolution of the ambiguity by means of word order and intonation in German is the result of a process of pragmatic strengthening, a mechanism that selects optimal candidates from a highly underspecified relation between form and meaning.

Severing the External Argument from its Verb

In his analysis of action sentences, Donald Davidson drew a clear distinction between arguments and adjuncts. Neglecting temporal relations, sentences like (1) We bought your slippers in

Fast 'Almost' and the Visibility Parameter for Functional Adverbs

It is shown that fast can intervene between VOICE and VP, but that it does not have access to the result state of telic verbs, and concludes that the Visibility Parameter is a lexical property of D-adverbs which varies across languages and dialects.

The Resultative Parameter and Restitutive Again

Stechow (1995) proposes a special interpretation principle that handles the interpretation of resultative constructions and Snyder (1995, 2000) argues that the availability of such an interpretation principle is subject to parametric variation.

Semantic Interfaces: Reference, Anaphora, and Aspect

This volume collects original papers - from some of the most prominent linguists in the world - on the theory of meaning (semantics) and its relation to syntax. The debate on syntax-semantics

Wanting, Having, and Getting: A Note on Fodor and Lepore 1998

This article takes up Fodor and Lepore's (1998) account of the meaning of [want DP]structures, according to which the verb to have is introduced at interpretation. With certain DP complements a want

Semantics in generative grammar

This chapter discusses truth-conditional Semantics and the Fregean Program, and first steps towards an Intensional Semantics.

Wi(e)der and Again(st)

It is by now a well-established fact that the occurrence of German wieder and English again may express that there has been a former event of the type described in the sentence like, e.g., the
...