Double‐Blind Comparison of Lidocaine and Etidocaine During Continuous Epidural Anesthesia for Vaginal Delivery

@article{Finucane1978DoubleBlindCO,
  title={Double‐Blind Comparison of Lidocaine and Etidocaine During Continuous Epidural Anesthesia for Vaginal Delivery},
  author={Brendan T Finucane and John McCraney and David F. Bush},
  journal={Southern Medical Journal},
  year={1978},
  volume={71},
  pages={667–669}
}
  • Brendan T Finucane, John McCraney, David F. Bush
  • Published 1978
  • Medicine
  • Southern Medical Journal
  • Etidocaine 0.5% plain, etidocaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000 and lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 1:200,000 were compared in a series of patients receiving epidural anesthesia for vaginal delivery. Results, based on data from 48 patients, showed a significant increase in the duration of action (P < .01%), the degree of sensory analgesia (P < .02%) and the degree of motor blockade (P < .01%) in the group that received etidocaine with epinephrine compared to the remaining groups. There were no… CONTINUE READING

    Topics from this paper.