• DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb13236.x
• Corpus ID: 44734545

Dotarizine versus flunarizine as calcium antagonists in chromaffin cells

@article{Villarroya1995DotarizineVF,
  title={Dotarizine versus flunarizine as calcium antagonists in chromaffin cells},
  author={M{\'e}rcedes Villarroya and Luis Gand{\'i}a and Baldomero Lara and Almudena Albillos and Manuela G. L{\'o}pez and Antonio G. Garc{\'i}a},
  journal={British Journal of Pharmacology},
  year={1995},
  volume={114}
}

• M. Villarroya, L. Gandía, +3 authors Antonio G. García
• Published 1 January 1995
• Biology
• British Journal of Pharmacology

1 Dotarizine is a novel piperazine derivative structurally related to flunarizine that is currently being evaluated in clinical trials for its antimigraine and antivertigo effects. This clinical profile may be related to its Ca2+ antagonist properties. Therefore, the actions of both compounds as calcium antagonists were compared in bovine chromaffin cells. 2 Dotarizine and flunarizine blocked 45Ca2+ uptake into K+ depolarized chromaffin cells (70 mm K+/0.5 mm Ca2+ for 60 s) in a concentration‐dependent manner, with IC50S of 4.8 and 6.7 μm, respectively. 3 Dotarizine and flunarizine also inhibited the whole‐cell Ca2+ and Ba2+ currents (Ica, IBa) in voltage‐clamped chromaffin cells, induced by depolarizing test pulses to 0 mV, during 50 ms, from a holding potential of − 80 mV. Blockade exhibited IC50S of 4 μm for dotarizine and 2.2 μm for flunarizine. Dotarizine increased the rate of inactivation of ICa and IBa; inhibition of whole‐cell currents was use‐dependent. 4 Transient increases of the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]i, produced by K+ stimulation (70 mm K+ for 5 s) of single fura‐2‐loaded chromaffin cells, were also inhibited by dotarizine and flunarizine with IC50s of 1.2 and 0.6 μm, respectively. Upon washout of dotarizine, the [Ca2+]i increases recovered fully after 5–10 min. In contrast, the responses remained largely inhibited 10 min after washing out flunarizine. 5 Catecholamine release induced by K+ stimulation (10‐s pulses of 70 mm) was inhibited by dotarizine with an IC50 of 2.6 μm and by flunarizine with an IC50 of 1.2 μm. The blocking effects of both compounds developed slowly, and was fully established after 20–30 min of superfusion. While blockade by dotarizine quickly reversed upon its washout, that of flunarizine lasted even 25 min after washing out. 6 Catecholamine release from electroporated chromaffin cells triggered by 10 μm Ca2+ was not affected by 10 μm dotarizine or flunarizine. 7 Overall, the results suggest that dotarizine behaves as a Ca2+ antagonist in bovine chromaffin cells. It exhibits a potency similar to flunarizine in blocking Ca2+ entry, Ca2+ channels, Cai2+ signals and secretion. The dotarizine effects are readily reversible suggesting that in contrast to flunarizine, it does not accumulate in cells. Dotarizine is devoid of intracellular effects on the secretory machinery. All its blocking effects on Ca2+ entry, [Ca2+]i rise and secretion are probably due to blockade of various Ca2+ channel subtypes in chromaffin cells. This blockade is use‐dependent and seems to be due to the increase by dotarizine of the rate of Ca2+ channel inactivation.