Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.

@article{Tubiana2005DoseeffectRA,
  title={Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Acad{\'e}mie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Acad{\'e}mie Nationale de M{\'e}decine.},
  author={Maurice Tubiana},
  journal={International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics},
  year={2005},
  volume={63 2},
  pages={
          317-9
        }
}
  • M. Tubiana
  • Published 2005
  • Medicine
  • International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
The aim of the Joint Report of the two French Academies is to discuss the validity of the linear non threshold (LNT) dose-effect relationship for assessing the detrimental effects of small doses such as those delivered by X-ray examinations (0.1 mGy to 20 mGy). The conclusion of the report is that extrapolation with LNT could greatly overestimate those risks and thus may have a detrimental effect for public health by discouraging physicians and patients from performing potentially useful… Expand
Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues
TLDR
The validity of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model of radiation damage, which is the basis of current regulation, is assessed, and the justification for this regulation is assessed. Expand
Estimating Risk of Low Radiation Doses – A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis
TLDR
An assessment of the LNT model's capacity to make accurate predictions of risk in the low-dose zone based on recent molecular mechanistic findings and epidemiological methods, with particular emphasis on the limitations of epidemiological studies to estimate risks in theLow-dose Zone. Expand
A review of low-level ionizing radiation and risk models of leukemia
TLDR
The main purpose of this article is to review and summarize the current state of knowledge and extant literature on the risk models, as well as the epidemiology of leukemia and its relationship to exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. Expand
Current Perspectives on the Use of the Linear Non-Threshold ( LNT ) Model in Radiation Protection
The increasing use of radiation in medical imaging and radiation therapy has raised concerns about the biological effects of radiation exposure, such as the stochastic and deterministic effects.Expand
Response to EPA Position on Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation
  • B. Cohen
  • Medicine
  • Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
  • 2010
TLDR
The paper by J. Puskin (2009) on “Perspective on use of Linear-No Threshold Theory (LNT) for radiation protection and risk assessment by the U.S. EPA” presents a highly over-simplified theoretical basis for supporting LNT down to the lowest doses, with very little attention to processes induced by low level radiation that prevent such events from developing into a fatal cancer. Expand
The health effects of low-dose radiation exposure
TLDR
There is a need for further studies on medical radiation exposure including CT and positron emission tomography in order to understand the health effects of low-LET radiation, including the cancer incidence. Expand
Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 2: low-level exposures and cancer risk.
TLDR
The authors address the need to put in perspective the risks of radiation exposure in the rapidly changing field of radiology, considering the current state of knowledge of effects at low levels and challenge the notion that any amount of radiation causes adverse effects. Expand
Reply to Cohen's Response to EPA Position on Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation
  • J. Puskin
  • Medicine
  • Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
  • 2010
TLDR
There is no strong indication of nonlinearity in the dose response for human carcinogenesis over this range, suggesting that the microarray results do not correlate well with proclivity for radiogenic cancer induction, and Cohen continues to maintain that his observed negative correlation between lung cancer rates and average radon levels in U.S. counties implies that environmental radon poses little or no risk. Expand
Radiation-Induced Neoplastic Transformation in vitro, Hormesis and Risk Assessment
  • J. Redpath, E. Elmore
  • Medicine
  • Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
  • 2006
TLDR
The notion that the endpoint of neoplastic transformation in vitro is a plausible endpoint to not only study mechanisms involved in response to low doses of radiation, but also to provide information of potential importance to risk assessment is supported. Expand
It's Time for a New Low-Dose-Radiation Risk Assessment Paradigm—One that Acknowledges Hormesis
  • B. Scott
  • Medicine
  • Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
  • 2008
TLDR
A novel, nonlinear, hormetic relative risk model for radiation-induced cancers is discussed in the context of establishing new radiation exposure limits for nuclear workers and the public. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
The carcinogenic effect of low doses: the validity of the linear no-threshold relationship
TLDR
For doses between 200 and 20 mSv the linear extrapolation could provide the superior limit of the risk although the actual risk might be much smaller and Assessment by LNT of the carcinogenic effect for doses below 10 mSV is not scientifically justified and should be banned. Expand
Risk of fatal versus incidental lung cancer in radon-exposed rats: A reanalysis of French data
TLDR
Data from radon experimental studies performed by this group in France suggest that the induction of lung cancer results from a complex inter- play between cumulative exposure and exposure rate, with an optimal combination of these two parameters that results in a maximum risk of Lung cancer induction. Expand
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know
  • D. Brenner, R. Doll, +12 authors M. Zaider
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2003
TLDR
The difficulties involved in quantifying the risks of low-dose radiation are reviewed, a linear extrapolation of cancer risks from intermediate to very low doses currently appears to be the most appropriate methodology, and a linearity assumption is not necessarily the most conservative approach. Expand
Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries
TLDR
Estimates of risk of cancer after protracted low doses of ionising radiation after nuclear workers in the largest study of nuclear workers ever conducted are higher than, but statistically compatible with, the risk estimates used for current radiation protection standards. Expand
Physics must join with biology in better assessing risk from low-dose irradiation.
This review summarises the complex response of mammalian cells and tissues to low doses of ionising radiation. This thesis encompasses induction of DNA damage, and adaptive protection against bothExpand
Radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: Evidence for a protective effect at low doses of low LET radiation
  • J. Redpath
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
  • 2004
TLDR
An interesting, and potentially important, finding is that low doses of low LET radiation can suppress neoplastic transformation in vitro to levels below that seen spontaneously. Expand
Threshold dose–response in radiation carcinogenesis: an approach from chronic β-irradiation experiments and a review of non-tumour doses
  • H. Tanooka
  • Biology, Medicine
  • International journal of radiation biology
  • 2001
TLDR
A threshold dose-response in radiation carcinogenesis appears in certain tissues and under certain conditions, and the optimum condition for demonstrating an apparent threshold is with partial-body chronic or repeated radiation rather than with acute whole-body radiation. Expand
A database of cancer induction by low-dose radiation in mammals: overview and initial observations
TLDR
The frequency of an apparent lack of effect or of protective effects, and of increased longevity in exposed animals, challenges the general validity of the Linear No Threshold Theory (LNT) and calls for research aimed at confirming or disproving the existence of beneficial effects of low-dose radiation on malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Expand
Effects of Exposure to Low-Dose-Rate 60Co Gamma Rays on Human Tumor Cells In Vitro
TLDR
Cells of three asynchronously growing human tumor cell lines, PC3, T98G and A7, which have been shown previously to demonstrate low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity to low acute single doses, were irradiated with 60Co γ rays and demonstrated an inverse dose-rate effect on cell survival at dose rates below 1 Gy h−1. Expand
Inverse radiation dose-rate effects on somatic and germ-line mutations and DNA damage rates.
  • M. Vilenchik, A. Knudson
  • Medicine, Biology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2000
TLDR
Reanalysis of published data shows that for both somatic and germ-line mutations there is an opposite, inverse DR effect, with reduction from low to very low DR, the overall dependence of induced mutations being parabolically related to DR. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...