Don't Patronize Me! An Experiment on Preferences for Authorship

  title={Don't Patronize Me! An Experiment on Preferences for Authorship},
  author={Silvia L{\"u}bbecke and Wendelin Schnedler},
  journal={Games \& Political Behavior eJournal},
Do people only reject interference and keep control in order to affect the outcome? We find that 20% of subjects reject unrequired help and insist on their solution to a problem – although doing so is costly and does not change the result. We tease out the motives by varying the information available to the interfering party (paternalist). Subjects do not resist to show to the paternalist that they were able to find the correct solution. Instead, two motives seem to play a role. First, subjects… 
1 Citations
Student Perception of Learning English Online
The aim of this research was to highlight the impact of online education on teaching and learning English as a foreign language among students aged 12-19, and to research the importance of learner


Illusion of control and the pursuit of authority
We measure participants’ willingness to pay for transparently useless authority—the right to make a completely uninformed task decision. We further elicit participants’ beliefs about receiving their
The intrinsic value of choice: The propensity to under-delegate in the face of potential gains and losses
In a simple choice task, it is shown that participants choose to pay in order to control their own payoff more than they should if they were to maximize monetary rewards and minimize monetary losses.
Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
A norm of 50-50 division appears to have considerable force in a wide range of economic environments, both in the real world and in the laboratory. Even in settings where one party unilaterally
Monitoring Your Friends, Not Your Foes: Strategic Ignorance and the Delegation of Real Authority
The use of strategic ignorance to delegate real authority within a firm is studied to confirm the theoretical predictions that optimal monitoring depends non-monotonically on the level of interest alignment.
Freedom, Power and Interference: An Experiment on Decision Rights
We propose a theoretical foundation for preference for decision rights, driven by preference for freedom, power, and non-interference, which can lead subjects to value decision rights intrinsically,
Departures from self-interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of “social preferences”. We design a range of simple experimental games that test these theories more directly than
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation
A central tenet of economics is that individuals respond to incentives. For psychologists and sociologists, in contrast, rewards and punishments are often counterproductive, because they undermine
The Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights
Philosophers, psychologists, and economists have long argued that certain decision rights carry not only instrumental value but may also be valuable for their own sake. The ideas of autonomy,
The Control Premium: A Preference for Payoff Autonomy †
We document a lower bound for thecontrol premium: agents' willingness to pay to control their own payoff. Participants choose between an asset that will pay only if they later answer a particular
A Theory of Reciprocity
The theory takes into account that people evaluate the kindness of an action not only by its consequences but also by the intention underlying this action, and explains the relevant stylized facts of a wide range of experimental games.