Domains of deontic reasoning: resolving the discrepancy between the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures.

@article{Fiddick2004DomainsOD,
  title={Domains of deontic reasoning: resolving the discrepancy between the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures.},
  author={Laurence Fiddick},
  journal={The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology},
  year={2004},
  volume={57 3},
  pages={447-74}
}
  • Laurence Fiddick
  • Published 2004 in
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology…
Deontic reasoning has been studied in two subfields of psychology: the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures. These literatures have drawn different conclusions about the nature of deontic reasoning. The consensus within the cognitive reasoning literature is that deontic reasoning is a unitary phenomenon, whereas the consensus within the moral reasoning literature is that there are different subdomains of deontic reasoning. We present evidence from a series of experiments employing the… CONTINUE READING
34 Citations
61 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 34 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 61 references

The deal and the danger: An evolutionary analysis of deontic reasoning

  • L. Fiddick
  • Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  • 1998
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

Hypothesis testing in Wason ’ s selection task : Social exchange cheating detection or task understanding

  • N. Liberman, Y. Klar
  • Cognition
  • 1996
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Hypothesis testing in Wason’s selection task: Social exchange cheating detection or task

  • N. Liberman, Y. Klar
  • understanding. Cognition,
  • 1996
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Important variables in reasoning about social rules

  • M. Barbieri
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • 1993
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Reasoning about promises and warnings : Darwinian algorithms , mental models , relevance judgments or pragmatic schemas ?

  • G. Politzer, A. Nguyen-Xuan
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • 1992
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…