Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making

  title={Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making},
  author={Emily Pronin and Christopher Y. Olivola and Kathleen A. Kennedy},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  pages={224 - 236}
Four experiments showed that the decisions people make for future selves and other people are similar to each other and different from their decisions for present selves. Experiments involved decisions to drink a disgusting liquid for scientific purposes (Experiment 1), tutor peers during exam week (Experiment 2), receive e-mails for charity (Experiment 3), and defer a lottery prize for a larger one (Experiment 4). These findings seemed to be at least partially rooted in the tendency for… 

Figures from this paper

Decisions for Others Are More Creative Than Decisions for the Self
It is demonstrated that people are more creative for others than for themselves and shed light on differences in self—other decision making.
Mental Accounting in Decision-Making for Self Versus Others
Previous studies have commonly used the third-person format to explore the generality of mental accounting and have observed the mental accounting effect when people predict others’ behavior.
Bursting Your Balloon: Examining Differences in Self-Other Decision Making Using the BART Task
Making risky decisions for oneself and the role affect play in that process has been extensively studied. In contrast however, little is known about the process of risky decision making on behalf of
Do Yourself a Favor: We Help Our Future Selves for the Same Reasons We Help Others
As humans we have a remarkable capacity to sacrifice for the future, and an equally remarkable capacity to shortchange it, leaving our future selves to pay the price. The research in this
Decisions for Others Become Less Impulsive the Further Away They Are on the Family Tree
A delay-discounting task was used to compare discount functions for choices that people would make for themselves against decisions that they think that other people should make, and found that the observed discount functions were steeper for choices in which the decision-maker was the beneficiary than for all other beneficiaries.
Does Standers-by Always See More Than Gamesters?A Review on the Self-other Decision Making Differences
Numerous studies have examined the differences between the conditions of giving advice to others, making decisions for others, and making decisions for oneself. An important reason for researchers to
Identity Over Time: Perceived Similarity Between Selves Predicts Well-Being 10 Years Later
When individuals feel similar to their future self, they are more likely to delay present gratification and make plans for the long run. But do these feelings of similarity actually correspond with
Letters to our Future Selves? High-Powered Replication Attempts Question Effects on Future Orientation, Delinquent Decisions, and Risky Investments
Enhancing people's future orientation, in particular continuity with their future selves, has been proposed as promising to mitigate self-control–related problem behavior. In two pre-registered,
Mapping out past and future minds: The perceived trajectory of rationality versus emotionality over time.
  • E. O’Brien
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. General
  • 2015
These findings build a bridge between mind perception and intertemporal dynamics, raising novel implications for the present as Thinking about the future may not uniformly "improve" decisions and behaviors; rather, it mostly facilitates rational-related pursuits, whereas thinking about the past may enhance feeling-related experiences.


Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: when the self is seen as an other.
Seven studies exploring people's tendency to make observer-like attributions about their past and future selves are presented, showing an inverse relationship for past and present selves between observer- like visual focus and salience of internal information.
You don't know me, but I know you: the illusion of asymmetric insight.
People, it is hypothesized, show an asymmetry in assessing their own interpersonal and intrapersonal knowledge relative to that of their peers, and several of the studies explored sources of this perceived asymmetry.
Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?
Two final studies suggest this divergence in accuracy arises, in part, because people are unwilling to consult population base rates when predicting their own behavior but use this diagnostic information more readily when predicting others'.
Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times.
This study tested 3 main hypotheses concerning people's predictions of task completion times: (a) People underestimate their own but not others' completion times, (b) people focus on plan-based
Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior
Abstract Understanding discrepancies between behavior and perceived self-interest has been one of the major, but largely untackled, theoretical challenges confronting decision theory from its infancy
Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients.
Participants were inclined to justify an unequal allocation of resources--provided that they, or a representative of their group, received the larger share--that few personally would have recommended, demanded, or imposed.
Social Projection of Transient Drive States
It is hypothesized that mentally trading places would lead to social projection of transient drive states, and participants' predictions of how they would feel in the hikers' situation statistically mediated the effect of exercise.