Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment?

  title={Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment?},
  author={L. Baldez and L. Epstein and Andrew D. Martin},
  journal={The Journal of Legal Studies},
  pages={243 - 283}
For over 3 decades, those engaged in the battle over the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), along with many scholarly commentators, have argued that ratification of the amendment will lead U.S. courts (1) to elevate the standard of law they now use to adjudicate claims of sex discrimination, which, in turn, could lead them (2) to find in favor of parties claiming a denial of their rights. We investigate both possibilities via an examination of constitutional sex discrimination litigation in the 50… Expand
The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme Court
Does law exhibit a significant constraint on Supreme Court justices' decisions? Although proponents of the attitudinal model argue that ideology predominantly influences justices' choices, “hybridExpand
A Transformative Approach to Anti- Discrimination Law in Latin America
In Latin America, a region with particular problems and challenges, anti-discrimination legal provisions have been rapidly growing, although without much scholarly attention. Recent reforms can beExpand
Judging Under Pressure: A Behavioral Examination of The Relationship Between Legal Decisionmaking and Time
The long-running debate about whether judges have adequate resources has begun to boil. State and federal legislatures are slashing court budgets, with many courts receiving up to 20 percentExpand
Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts
  • M. Sen
  • Psychology
  • The Journal of Legal Studies
  • 2015
I use two newly collected data sets to demonstrate that black federal district judges are consistently overturned on appeal more often than white district judges, with a gap in reversal rates of upExpand
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
We enter the debate over the role of sex in judging by addressing the two predominant empirical questions it raises: whether male and female judges decide cases distinctly (individual effects) andExpand
Panel Composition and Voting on the U.S. Courts of Appeals over Time
Studies of the the U.S. Courts of Appeals increasingly have moved beyond studying the voting behavior of judges in isolation from their panel colleagues and toward an approach that takes into accountExpand
Constitutionalizing Difference: A Case Study Analysis of Gender Provisions in Botswana and South Africa
This article examines the use of gender in constitutions and its significance for gender equality. New democracies, and some older ones, are increasingly including gender provisions in theirExpand
Constitutions and women’s rights advocacy: strategic uses of gender provisions in Argentina, Chile, Botswana, and South Africa
ABSTRACT We examine gender provisions in national constitutions and their significance for women’s rights advocacy in Latin America and southern Africa. There is considerable debate about whetherExpand
Endogenous Jurisprudential Regimes
Jurisprudential regime theory is a legal explanation of decision-making on the U.S. Supreme Court that asserts that a key precedent in an area of law fundamentally restructures the relationshipExpand
Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
Gender equality provisions have become nearly standard in constitutional design for new democracies. How do such provisions affect the ability of women’s rights advocates to achieve social change? ToExpand


Does an Equal Rights Amendment Make a Difference
Because the proposed Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution was never ratified, one cannot know with certainty what its impact would have been. At the state level, however, theExpand
Constitutionalizing Women's Equality
The U.S. Constitution is the only major written constitution that includes a bill of rights but lacks a provision explicitly declaring the equality of the sexes. Since 1946 the French ConstitutionExpand
Nguyen v. INS and the Application of Intermediate Scrutiny to Gender Classifications: Theory, Practice, and Reality
The Supreme Court has articulated three theoretically different standards of review for determining whether government action has denied any person equal protection of the laws: rational basis,Expand
Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice
Chronological Table of Cases Tables, Figures, and Boxes Preface I. THE SUPREME COURT AND THE CONSTITUTION 1. Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court 2. The Judiciary: Institutional Powers andExpand
How does the U.S. Supreme Court reach decisions? Since the 1940s, scholars have focused on two distinct explanations. The legal model suggests that the rule of law (stare decisis) is the keyExpand
Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study
  • M. Hall
  • Political Science
  • The Journal of Politics
  • 1987
This study examines the low rate of dissent in state supreme courts and argues that this trend might be accounted for, in part, by certain institutional arrangements. Specifically, in state supremeExpand
The Norm of Stare Decisis
Theory: Precedent might affect Supreme Court decision making in a number of ways. One conception, the conventional view scrutinized by Segal and Spaeth, sees precedent as the primary reason whyExpand
Gay Rights and American Law
Gay Rights and American Law is a qualitative and quantitative study of all reported American appellate-court decisions dealing with lesbian-and-gay-rights claims during the last two decades of theExpand
Environmental Regulation, Ideology, and the D. C. Circuit
Richard L. Revesz* S INCE the early 1970s, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has played a central role in the development of environmental law. This role isExpand