Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings ?

@inproceedings{armstrong1991DoesTN,
  title={Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings ?},
  author={jeanne. armstrong and Raymond Hubbard},
  year={1991}
}
As Cicchetti indicates, agreement among reviewers is not high. This conclusion is empirically supported by Fiske and Fogg (1990), who reported that two independent reviews of the same papers typically had no critical point in common. Does this imply that journal editors should strive for a high level of reviewer consensus as a criterion for publication? Prior research suggests that such a requirement would inhibit the publication of papers with controversial findings. We summarize this research… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 22 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-7 of 7 references

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review

R. A. McNutt
Journal of the American Medical Associatio n • 1990

“ But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper ! ” Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments

L. Fogg
American Psychologis t • 1990
View 2 Excerpts

Seeing atoms,

A. Fisher
Popular Science, • 1989
View 1 Excerpt

Research on scientific journals : Implications for editors and authors

J. S. Armstrong
Journal of Forecastin g

The ombudsman : Is peer review by peers as fair as it appears ? ”

J. S. Armstrong
Interfaces

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…