Does status affect intergroup perceptions of humanity?

  title={Does status affect intergroup perceptions of humanity?},
  author={D. Capozza and L. Andrighetto and G. A. di Bernardo and Rossella Falvo},
  journal={Group Processes \& Intergroup Relations},
  pages={363 - 377}
Across three studies, we examined whether ingroup status may affect intergroup perceptions of humanity. In Studies 1 and 2, we considered real groups: Northern versus Southern Italians; in Study 3, we manipulated the socioeconomic status of two minimal groups. In all studies, members of higher status groups perceived the ingroup as more human than the outgroup, while members of lower status groups did not assign a privileged human status to the ingroup. Such findings were obtained using… Expand

Tables from this paper

The Perception of Instability and Legitimacy of Status Differences Enhances the Infrahumanization Bias among High Status Groups
The results of a moderated regression aimed at predicting infrahumanization showed that high-status group members who perceived status differences as legitimate and unstable reported higher levels of infra humanization than their counterparts did. Expand
Intergroup contact as a strategy to improve humanness attributions: A review of studies
Over the past 15 years, outgroup dehumanization has been a topic of great interest in the field of social psychology. Researchers have in particular investigated the different forms of dehumanizationExpand
Can imagined contact favor the “humanization” of the homeless?
Research on imagined contact, a new prejudice-reduction strategy, has demonstrated its beneficial effects on several aspects of intergroup relations. Emerging evidence has shown that this form ofExpand
On the Cognitive Determinants of Out-Group Dehumanization: Illusory Correlation and the Dehumanization of (Numerical) Group Minorities
Humanness is something generally associated with the in-group and denied to out-groups. However, not all out-groups are equally deprived of their humanness. Correlational studies suggest thatExpand
Effects of minimal grouping on implicit prejudice, infrahumanization, and neural processing despite orthogonal social categorizations
It is found that participants infrahumanized and showed implicit bias toward the minimal outgroup, despite the cross-cutting presence of race, and in fact did not show any of the usual implicit racial bias. Expand
  • 2020
Meta-dehumanization, the perception your group has been given less than human qualities, contributes to a vicious cycle of outgroup dehumanization and hostility, such as, hate crimes and support forExpand
Cross-group Friendships, Extended Contact, and Humanity Attributions to Homosexuals
Abstract The aim of the present paper was to test whether cross-group friendships and extended contact (knowing that ingroup members have a friendly relationship with outgroup members) are related toExpand
Intergroup Contact and Outgroup Humanization: Is the Causal Relationship Uni- or Bidirectional?
Findings demonstrate the bidirectionality of the relationship between contact and humanity attributions: the attribution of uniquely human traits to the outgroup was stronger in the contact than in the no-contact conditions. Expand
When in Rome… Identification and acculturation strategies among minority members moderate the dehumanisation of the majority outgroup
The study of humanness as a dimension of social judgment has received extensive attention over the past decade. Although the common reported finding is that people attribute more humanExpand
Understanding dehumanization: the role of agency and communion
Abstract Dehumanization is the denial of full human potential to an individual or a social group. Although it is widely seen as a grave social ill, the psychological roots of dehumanization are notExpand


Status, communality, and agency: implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups.
Four studies addressed the hypothesis, based on correspondence bias, that low- relative to high-status individuals are perceived as more communal and less agentic, and received clear support in Studies 3 and 4, in which a general instantiation of status independent of occupations, social roles, and gender was adopted. Expand
On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: the implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations.
Using an approach-avoidance procedure, Study 4 showed that people not only deprive the out-group of positive consequences as in the former studies but that people also act against theout-group. Expand
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
Allport (1954) recognized that attachment to one's ingroups does not necessarily require hostility toward outgroups. Yet the prevailing approach to the study of ethnocentrism, ingroup bias, andExpand
Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences
Infra-humanizing outgroups involves considering outgroups less human and more animal-like than the ingroup, which is perceived, in essence, as fully human. In this article, the first section presentsExpand
The social functions of ingroup bias: Creating, confirming, or changing social reality
We describe our motivational analysis of ingroup bias. Central to our approach are two functions of ingroup bias: an identity function (the creation and expression of one's social identity) and anExpand
Applying the SCM to a specific intergroup relationship: Northern versus southern Italians
In the present study the SCM was applied to a specific and culturally salient intergroup relationship: Northern versus Southern Italians. We aimed to investigate whether the perceptions of structuralExpand
The uniquely human content of stereotypes
The uniquely human content of stereotypes was measured in nine different inter-group comparisons that varied in terms of competence and warmth. Results indicated that the infrahumanization biasExpand
Superordinate Categorization as a Moderator of Mutual Infrahumanization
This research applies the Common Ingroup Identity Model (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000) to explore the moderating role of superordinate categorization in infrahumanization. Two studies were conductedExpand
Individuals tend to associate uniquely human features, for example the fact of feeling secondary emotions, more to ingroup than to outgroup. However, little evidence exists for a direct link betweenExpand
Infrahumanization or Familiarity? Attribution of Uniquely Human Emotions to the Self, the Ingroup, and the Outgroup
People attribute more secondary emotions to their ingroup than to outgroups, and familiarity could explain this differential attribution because secondary emotions are thought to be less visible and intense than primary ones. Expand