Does Optimization Imply Rationality?

@article{Mongin2004DoesOI,
  title={Does Optimization Imply Rationality?},
  author={Philippe Mongin},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={124},
  pages={73-111}
}
The relations between rationality and optimizationhave been widely discussed in the wake of HerbertSimon's work, with the common conclusion that therationality concept does not imply the optimizationprinciple. The paper is partly concerned with addingevidence for this view, but its main, more challengingobjective is to question the converse implication fromoptimization to rationality, which is accepted even bybounded rationality theorists. We discuss three topicsin succession: (1) rationally… 

Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice

Most economists define rationality in terms of consistency principles. These principles place ?bounds? on rationality?bounds that range from perfect consistency to weak stochastic transitivity.

The forgotten role of the rationality principle in economics

This paper aims to show that, throughout the history of economics, an increasingly wide gap has developed between the rationality principle, usually considered as the fundamental principle of

Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating

The critics of rational choice theory (henceforth, RCT) frequently claim that RCT is self-defeating in the sense that agents who abide by RCT’s prescriptions are less successful in satisfying their

Making Sense of Intransitivity, Incompleteness and Discontinuity of Preferences

TLDR
It is shown that there are grounds for arguing that even the completeness principle as well as continuity of preferences may, quite plausibly, be violated.

Why Maximize Expected Choice‐Worthiness?1

This paper argues in favor of a particular account of decision-making under normative uncertainty: that, when it is possible to do so, one should maximize expected choice-worthiness. Though this

The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggerated

TLDR
The paper reexamines the controversy about Bergson–Samuelson social welfare functions and eventually endorses Samuelson’s conclusion that welfare economics was left untouched by the controversy.

And so on: two theories of regress arguments in philosophy

This PhD dissertation is on infinite regress arguments in philosophy. Its main goals are to explain what such arguments from many distinct philosophical debates have in common, and to provide

The Impotence of the Value Pump

TLDR
It is argued that the fact that someone loses out in a value pump provides no reason to believe that they are irrational, and the VP is impotent.

A Political Justification of Nudging

Thaler and Sunstein justify nudge policies from welfaristic premises: nudges are acceptable because they benefit the individuals who are nudged. A tacit assumption behind this strategy is that we can

Preferences: neither behavioural nor mental

  • F. Guala
  • Economics, Psychology
    Economics and Philosophy
  • 2019
Abstract Recent debates on the nature of preferences in economics have typically assumed that they are to be interpreted either as behavioural regularities or as mental states. In this paper I

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 87 REFERENCES

Rationality and dynamic choice

This is a major contribution to the theory of rational choice which will be of particular interest to philosophers and economists. The author sets out the foundations of rational choice, and then

THE IRRATIONALITY OF INTRANSITIVITY

A RECENT discussion of welfare economics 'summarizes the question of transitivity as follows. There is not now conclusive reason to believe that the assumption of transitivity of preference in

The Philosophy of Intransitive Preference

This paper argues against the proposition that rationality necessarily requires preferences to be transitive. Attention is given predominantly to the logic of the arguments purporting to show that

Rationalizable Strategic Behavior

THE NOTION OF EQUILIBRIUM proposed by Nash [19] has come to play a dominant role in economic applications of noncooperative games. While analyses of Nash equilibria have unquestionably contributed to

Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility (1950)

After introducing some basic concepts and three postulates on rational choice, it is proposed to show that if the economists’ theory of assets is completed by a fourth postulate on rational choice,

CHOICE WITHOUT PREFERENCE. A Study of the History and of the Logic of the Problem of “Buridan's Ass”

*A logical theory may be tested by its capacity for dealing with puzzles, and it is a wholesome plan, in thinking about logic, to stock the mind with äs many puzzles äs possible, since these serve

The quest for optimality : A positive heuristic of science ?

I will present evidence that nature does not optimize in the sense of Fermat’s principle of least time, contrary to what Schoemaker’s unintentionally ambiguous exposition might suggest. First,

Dutch Bookies and Money Pumps

C ONCLUSIVE arguments in philosophy are rare, so any such argument we find we prize. If it is not only conclusive but clever, all the better for it. The Dutch book arguments of the theory of

Axiomatic Characterizations of Rational Choice in Strategic Environme nts

For more than forty years, economists have wrestled with the elusive notion of "rational" behavior in strategic environments, generating a variety of competing approaches. Even for simple,

Rational Choice Functions and Orderings1

The language of the theory of consumers' demand is still somewhat confused despite the great progress that has been made in recent years.2 The basic purpose of the theory is to explain the demand
...