Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction

@article{Schkade1998DoesLI,
  title={Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction},
  author={David A. Schkade and Daniel Kahneman},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={1998},
  volume={9},
  pages={340 - 346}
}
Large samples of students in the Midwest and in Southern California rated satisfaction with life overall as well as with various aspects of life, for either themselves or someone similar to themselves in one of the two regions. Self-reported overall life satisfaction was the same in both regions, but participants who rated a similar other expected Californians to be more satisfied than Midwesterners. Climate-related aspects were rated as more important for someone living in another region than… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Would You Be Happier If You Looked Better? A Focusing Illusion

Some people might believe that individuals who are more satisfied with their body are also happier. However, people tend to overrate the influence of some factors (e.g. money or health) on their

Happier Than Thou? A Self-Enhancement Bias in Emotion Attribution

It is demonstrated that people display an emotional self-enhancement bias that varies with the context of the emotion-eliciting situation, and that this attribution bias extends across multiple dimensions of psychological distance.

Life Satisfaction of U.S. Counties Predicts Population Growth

  • R. E. Lucas
  • Psychology
    Social psychological and personality science
  • 2014
It is shown that U.S. counties with higher levels of life satisfaction grew at substantially faster rates than did counties with low life satisfaction, and this association was not due to regional differences in birth or death rates.

Is the grass always greener on the other side? Social comparisons of subjective well-being

This study investigates subjective well-being (SWB) among residents of Munich (n = 380) and Venice (n = 545) with respect to their individual SWB and their judgments of SWB for residents of their own

What constitutes a good life? Cultural differences in the role of positive and negative affect in subjective well-being.

Support is found for the hypothesis that differences in subjective well-being between Europeans and European Americans may be due to the psychological meanings Eastern and Western cultures attach to positive and negative affect.

Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?

Two final studies suggest this divergence in accuracy arises, in part, because people are unwilling to consult population base rates when predicting their own behavior but use this diagnostic information more readily when predicting others'.

Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion

It is argued that people exaggerate the contribution of income to happiness because they focus, in part, on conventional achievements when evaluating their life or the lives of others.

Explaining False Uniqueness: Why We are Both Better and Worse Than Others

People see themselves as unique from others – as having better personalities and abilities, more desirable opinions, and brighter futures than almost everyone else. In the past, researchers

Personal Income and Subjective Well-being: A Review

Conventional wisdom holds that money has little relevance to happiness. This review will demonstrate quite the opposite is true and will argue that case using the Homeostatic Theory of Subjective
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

Most People Are Happy

Myers and Diener (1995) asked “Who is happy?” but examined the question of who is more and who is less happy In fact, most people report a positive level of subjective well-being (SWB), and say that

Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health.

Research suggesting that certain illusions may be adaptive for mental health and well-being is reviewed, examining evidence that a set of interrelated positive illusions—namely, unrealistically positive self-evaluations, exaggerated perceptions of control or mastery, and unrealistic optimism—can serve a wide variety of cognitive, affective, and social functions.

Events and subjective well-being: only recent events matter.

It was found that only life events during the previous 3 months influenced life satisfaction and positive and negative affect, and good and bad events co-occur, suggesting an exciting avenue for explorations of the structure of life events.

Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative?

Lottery winners were not happier than controls and took significantly less pleasure from a series of mundane events, and Paraplegics also demonstrated a contrast effect, not by enhancing minor pleasures but by idealizing their past, which did not help their present happiness.

Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

The present experiments suggest that people neglect the psychological immune system when making affective forecasts.

Happiness Is a Stochastic Phenomenon

Happiness, or subjective well-being, was measured on a birth-record-based sample of several thousand middle-aged twins using the Well-Being (WB) scale of the Multidimensional Personality

Choices, Values, and Frames

We discuss the cognitive and the psy- chophysical determinants of choice in risky and risk- less contexts. The psychophysics of value induce risk aversion in the domain of gains and risk seeking in

Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability.

This article presents a new theory of subjective probability according to which different descriptions of the same event can give rise to different judgments. The experimental evidence confirms the

Community noise problems: Evidence against adaptation

The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

This article seeks to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ, and delineates the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena.