Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence

@article{Landy2015DoesID,
  title={Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence},
  author={Justin F. Landy and Geoffrey P. Goodwin},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  year={2015},
  volume={10},
  pages={518 - 536}
}
The role of emotion in moral judgment is currently a topic of much debate in moral psychology. One specific claim made by many researchers is that irrelevant feelings of disgust can amplify the severity of moral condemnation. Numerous researchers have found this effect, but there have also been several published failures to replicate it. Clarifying this issue would inform important theoretical debates among rival accounts of moral judgment. We meta-analyzed all available studies—published and… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Incidental disgust does not cause moral condemnation of neutral actions
TLDR
Bayesian analyses provided substantial evidence for the null hypothesis that incidental disgust does not affect moral ratings, in line with a recent meta-analysis suggesting that disgust has no effect on moral ratings.
Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?
Abstract The past few decades of moral psychology research have yielded empirical anomalies for rationalist theories of moral judgments. An increasing number of psychologists and philosophers argue
Disgust and Moral Judgment: Distinguishing Between Elicitors and Feelings Matters
We investigated the scope of the effect of disgust on moral judgments. In two field experiments (Experiment 1, N = 142, Experiment 2, N = 248), we manipulated whether participants were exposed to a
Our Conclusions Were Tentative, But Appropriate
  • J. Landy, Geoffrey P. Goodwin
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2015
TLDR
The metaanalysis clarifies the state of the evidence regarding social intuitionism’s most fundamental theoretical claim and responds to concerns raised by Schnall et al. themselves.
Moral Violations and the Experience of Disgust and Anger
TLDR
Activation of overlapping brain regions between core and moral disgust is the result of content overlap in the vignettes—core disgust elicitors—across conditions, and not from moral violations per se, which runs contrary to the premise that the authors' “moral center” is connected to the area of the brain in which physical revulsion is located.
The Physiological Basis of Psychological Disgust and Moral Judgments
TLDR
It is demonstrated that the antiemetic ginger (Zingiber officinale), known to inhibit nausea, reduces feelings of disgust toward nonmoral purity-offending stimuli, providing the first experimental evidence that disgust is causally rooted in physiological nausea.
Disgust Sensitivity Relates to Moral Foundations Independent of Political Ideology
Moral judgments seem related to the emotion disgust. Evolutionary considerations might illuminate the psychological processes underlying this relation. Several studies have noted that individuals who
Individual Differences in Moral Disgust Do Not Predict Utilitarian Judgments, Sexual and Pathogen Disgust Do
TLDR
This study analyzes the associations between The Three Domain Disgust Scale and the most commonly used 12 moral dilemmas measuring utilitarian/deontological preferences with Structural Equation Modeling and indicates that of the three domains of disgust, only sexual disgust is associated with more deontological moral preferences.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 132 REFERENCES
Moral judgment modulation by disgust is bi-directionally moderated by individual sensitivity
TLDR
It is found that individual change in moral acceptability ratings due to disgust priming was modulated by individual sensitivity to disgust, revealing a bi-directional function.
The emotional basis of moral judgments
Recent work in cognitive science provides overwhelming evidence for a link between emotion and moral judgment. I review findings from psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and research on
The moral emotions: a social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt.
TLDR
Support is found for the prediction that anger, disgust, and contempt should be differentiable both in antecedent appraisals and in consequent actions and judgments, and for evidence that these emotions are associated with different consequences.
[Dispositional mindfulness modulates automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment].
TLDR
It is suggested that being present prevents automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment even when prepotent emotions elicited by the thought of killing one person to save several others and utilitarian reasoning conflict.
Judging Fatness: The Effects of Emotion on Moral Judgment and Moral Judgment on Emotion
Research regarding the CAD Triad Hypothesis shows that three specific emotions (contempt, anger, and disgust) are associated with three matched types of moral transgressions (community, autonomy, and
Judging Smokers: How Anger and Disgust Shape Our Moral Beliefs
Cigarette smoking is a moralized behavior in American culture, with smokers judged as immoral people. Moral judgments in general are informed by emotions, and the CAD triad hypothesis suggests that
Landy and Goodwin (2015) Confirmed Most of Our Findings Then Drew the Wrong Conclusions
TLDR
A robust amplification effect of olfactory disgust on moral judgment even in the absence of important moderator variables is found, including a clear and robust effect for studies that used taste or smell to induce disgust.
...
...