Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence

  title={Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence},
  author={Justin F. Landy and Geoffrey P. Goodwin},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  pages={518 - 536}
The role of emotion in moral judgment is currently a topic of much debate in moral psychology. One specific claim made by many researchers is that irrelevant feelings of disgust can amplify the severity of moral condemnation. Numerous researchers have found this effect, but there have also been several published failures to replicate it. Clarifying this issue would inform important theoretical debates among rival accounts of moral judgment. We meta-analyzed all available studies—published and… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Incidental disgust does not cause moral condemnation of neutral actions

Bayesian analyses provided substantial evidence for the null hypothesis that incidental disgust does not affect moral ratings, in line with a recent meta-analysis suggesting that disgust has no effect on moral ratings.

Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?

Abstract The past few decades of moral psychology research have yielded empirical anomalies for rationalist theories of moral judgments. An increasing number of psychologists and philosophers argue

Disgust and Moral Judgment: Distinguishing Between Elicitors and Feelings Matters

We investigated the scope of the effect of disgust on moral judgments. In two field experiments (Experiment 1, N = 142, Experiment 2, N = 248), we manipulated whether participants were exposed to a

Our Conclusions Were Tentative, But Appropriate

  • J. LandyGeoffrey P. Goodwin
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2015
The metaanalysis clarifies the state of the evidence regarding social intuitionism’s most fundamental theoretical claim and responds to concerns raised by Schnall et al. themselves.

Moral Violations and the Experience of Disgust and Anger

Activation of overlapping brain regions between core and moral disgust is the result of content overlap in the vignettes—core disgust elicitors—across conditions, and not from moral violations per se, which runs contrary to the premise that the authors' “moral center” is connected to the area of the brain in which physical revulsion is located.

The Effects of Disgust on Moral Judgments

There is evidence that inducing feelings of disgust increases the severity of moral judgments, but the size of this association has been questioned by a recent meta-analysis. Based on prior research

The Physiological Basis of Psychological Disgust and Moral Judgments

It is demonstrated that the antiemetic ginger (Zingiber officinale), known to inhibit nausea, reduces feelings of disgust toward nonmoral purity-offending stimuli, providing the first experimental evidence that disgust is causally rooted in physiological nausea.

Disgust Sensitivity Relates to Moral Foundations Independent of Political Ideology

Moral judgments seem related to the emotion disgust. Evolutionary considerations might illuminate the psychological processes underlying this relation. Several studies have noted that individuals who

Individual Differences in Moral Disgust Do Not Predict Utilitarian Judgments, Sexual and Pathogen Disgust Do

This study analyzes the associations between The Three Domain Disgust Scale and the most commonly used 12 moral dilemmas measuring utilitarian/deontological preferences with Structural Equation Modeling and indicates that of the three domains of disgust, only sexual disgust is associated with more deontological moral preferences.



Moral judgment modulation by disgust is bi-directionally moderated by individual sensitivity

It is found that individual change in moral acceptability ratings due to disgust priming was modulated by individual sensitivity to disgust, revealing a bi-directional function.

With a Clean Conscience

The findings support the idea that moral judgment can be driven by intuitive processes, rather than deliberate reasoning, and one of those intuitions appears to be physical purity, because it has a strong connection to moral purity.

The emotional basis of moral judgments

Recent work in cognitive science provides overwhelming evidence for a link between emotion and moral judgment. I review findings from psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and research on

The moral emotions: a social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt.

Support is found for the prediction that anger, disgust, and contempt should be differentiable both in antecedent appraisals and in consequent actions and judgments, and for evidence that these emotions are associated with different consequences.

On the Role of Attention and Emotion in Morality

The present work demonstrates that attentional control regulates the effect of disgust, and suggests that unrelated influences of disgust on moral judgments are contingent on the attention system.

[Dispositional mindfulness modulates automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment].

It is suggested that being present prevents automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment even when prepotent emotions elicited by the thought of killing one person to save several others and utilitarian reasoning conflict.

Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment

Experiments 2-4 showed that the role of disgust in severity of moral judgments depends on participants' sensitivity to their own bodily sensations, indicating the importance—and specificity—of gut feelings in moral judgments.