Does Global Democracy Require a World State?

@article{Erman2019DoesGD,
  title={Does Global Democracy Require a World State?},
  author={Eva Erman},
  journal={Philosophical Papers},
  year={2019},
  volume={48},
  pages={123 - 153}
}
  • Eva Erman
  • Published 2 January 2019
  • Political Science
  • Philosophical Papers
Abstract The question of whether global democracy requires a world state has with few exceptions been answered with an unequivocal ‘No’. A world state, it is typically argued, is neither feasible nor desirable. Instead, different forms of global governance arrangements have been suggested, involving non-hierarchical and multilayered models with dispersed authority. The overall aim of this paper is to addresses the question of whether global democracy requires a world state, adopting a so-called… 
1 Citations
The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Some Normative Concerns
Abstract The creation of increasingly complex artificial intelligence (AI) systems raises urgent questions about their ethical and social impact on society. Since this impact ultimately depends on

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 79 REFERENCES
No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique
  • L. Valentini
  • Political Science, Sociology
    Perspectives on Politics
  • 2014
A globalized world, some argue, needs a global democracy. But there is considerable disagreement about whether global democracy is an ideal worth pursuing. One of the main grounds for scepticism is
Why Adding Democratic Values is Not Enough for Global Democracy
The social and political space is no longer entirely mapped in terms of territorial places and borders. What is characteristic of our globalizing era is the growth of problems that transgress
Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives
Democracy might be characterized, semicircularly, as a matter of “groups of people making collective decisions in a democratic way.” I employ that circularity deliberately to bracket off the part of
Doing things by halves: on intermediary global institutional proposals
Various cosmopolitan theorists offer global institutional prescriptions intended to be understood as residing conceptually between a system of separate domestic states and a federal world state. In
Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance
Since the 1990s, the disciplines of European Studies and International Relations have taken a remarkable normative turn. Questions of democratic legitimacy, which, for many years, were marginalized
Building Democracy at the Bar: The European Court of Human Rights as an Agent of Transitional Cosmopolitanism
How, if at all, does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) promote more just states which vary greatly in their democratic credentials? The article considers the ECtHR and its practices from the
Global political legitimacy beyond justice and democracy?
Despite the broad consensus on the value of political legitimacy in global politics, there is still little agreement on what the specific regulative content of the principles of legitimacy ought to
The Frontiers of Democracy
Democratization is a complex process that entails critical choices of new legislative and institutional frameworks, but that should also trigger citizens’ engagement and a change in mentality that
Global democracy: in the beginning
  • R. Goodin
  • Political Science
    International Theory
  • 2010
Many who discuss global democracy think in terms of a Reform-Act model of democracy, with the ideal being ‘one person one vote for all affected by the decisions’ as in, for example, a second
Who’s afraid of a world state? A global sovereign and the statist-cosmopolitan debate
Wary of quick statist dismissal of their proposals, cosmopolitans have been careful not to associate themselves with a world state. I argue that this caution is mistaken: cosmopolitans should see the
...
...