Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns

@article{Johnston2012DoesDW,
  title={Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns},
  author={Patrick B. Johnston},
  journal={International Security},
  year={2012},
  volume={36},
  pages={47-79}
}
Is killing or capturing insurgent leaders an effective tactic? Previous research on interstate war and counterterrorism has suggested that targeting enemy leaders does not work. Most studies of the efficacy of leadership decapitation, however, have relied on unsystematic evidence and poor research design. An analysis based on fresh evidence and a new research design indicates the opposite relationship and yields four key findings. First, campaigns are more likely to end quickly when… Expand
Precipitating the decline of Al-Shabaab: a case study in leadership decapitation
Abstract : The tactic of leadership decapitation, using military action to capture or kill terrorist leadership, is a key component of United States counterterrorism strategy. Policymakers argue thatExpand
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Leadership Decapitation Tactics Against Terrorist Groups
This chapter examines the effectiveness of leadership decapitation as a counterterrorism tool. Several States have put decapitation tactics—those that seek to kill or capture the leader of anExpand
Targeting Top Terrorists: How Leadership Decapitation Contributes to Counterterrorism
  • B. Price
  • Political Science
  • International Security
  • 2012
Several states, including Israel and the United States, have put decapitation tactics, which seek to kill or capture leaders of terrorist organizations, at the forefront of their counterterrorismExpand
Leadership Matters: The Effects of Targeted Killings on Militant Group Tactics
ABSTRACT Targeted killings have become a central component of counterterrorism strategy. In response to the unprecedented prevalence of this strategy around the world, numerous empirical studies haveExpand
Counterterrorism Strategies: Leadership Decapitation vs Mid-tier Elimination
Western nations have long seen the impact of terrorist activity in foreign environments, but after the tragic attacks on September 11th and the bombings in London and Madrid, western nations realizeExpand
Headhunting: Evaluating the Disruptive Capacity of Leadership Decapitation on Terrorist Organizations
What are the circumstances that allow a decapitation strike to be optimally effective in destabilising a terrorist group? What effect does decapitation have on the terrorist groups that experienceExpand
Attacking the Leader, Missing the Mark: Why Terrorist Groups Survive Decapitation Strikes
  • J. Jordan
  • Political Science
  • International Security
  • 2014
Leadership targeting has become a key feature of counterterrorism policy. Both academics and policymakers have argued that the removal of leaders is an effective strategy in combating terrorism.Expand
Explaining Indiscriminate Violence: Leadership Deficits and Militant Group Tactics
Certain types of militant groups are prone to indiscriminate violence — those suffering from leadership deficits. These deficits exacerbate the principal-agent problem between leaders and footExpand
Pick your Poison: Assessing the Strategic Effectiveness of Decapitation via Drone Strikes by Looking at the Organizational Dynamics of Targeted Groups
Leadership targeting, or decapitation, which involves the removal of an organization’s leader, has been utilized in various military conflicts. The use of drones has been particularly consequentialExpand
Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency in Somalia: Assessing the Campaign Against Al Shabaab
Abstract : This study examines the counterterrorism and counterinsurgency campaign against al Shabaab in Somalia. It concludes that, while al Shabaab was weakened between 2011 and 2016, the group isExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 54 REFERENCES
When Heads Roll: Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Decapitation
Leadership targeting has become a key feature of current counterterrorism policies. Both academics and policy makers have argued that the removal of leaders is an effective strategy in combatingExpand
Targeted Killings in Afghanistan: Measuring Coercion and Deterrence in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency
This article examines the coercive and deterrent utility of targeting the leaders of violent, non-state organizations with precision force. Building on the literatures on targeted killings andExpand
Do Democracies Make Inferior Counterinsurgents? Reassessing Democracy's Impact on War Outcomes and Duration
  • J. Lyall
  • Economics
  • International Organization
  • 2010
Abstract A core proposition from decades of research on internal wars asserts that democracies, with their casualty-averse publics, accountable leaders, and free media, are uniquely prone to losingExpand
Testing the Snake Head Strategy: Does Killing or Capturing Its Leaders Reduce a Terrorist Group's Activity?
Since the attacks of 9/11 the search for effective counter- terror strategies has become an urgent priority for policy makers. Dr. Audrey Kurth Cronin, a Professor at the National War College, hasExpand
Do Targeted Assassinations Work? A Multivariate Analysis of Israel's Controversial Tactic during Al-Aqsa Uprising 1
We assess the impact of Israel's targeted assassinations policy on rates of Palestinian violence from September 2000, the beginning of Al-Aqsa uprising, through June 2004. Literature concerning theExpand
Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: The Causes of Civilian Victimization in War
Despite normative and legal injunctions against targeting civilians in war, as well as doubts regarding the effectiveness of such strategies, belligerents have frequently turned their guns onExpand
The ABCs of HVT: Key Lessons from High Value Targeting Campaigns Against Insurgents and Terrorists
The use of high value targeting (HVT)—using military and police forces to kill or capture leaders of insurgent and terrorist groups—has increased exponentially since the terrorist attacks ofExpand
Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars
Abstract During the nineteenth century, states routinely defeated insurgent foes. Over the twentieth century, however, this pattern reversed itself, with states increasingly less likely to defeatExpand
“Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare
Why do some wars result in the intentional killing of large numbers of civilians? In this article we examine the incidence of mass killing in all wars from 1945 to 2000. In the statistical analysisExpand
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
An influential conventional wisdom holds that civil wars proliferated rapidly with the end of the Cold War and that the root cause of many or most of these has been ethnic and religious antagonisms.Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...