Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning

@article{Skitka2002DoTM,
  title={Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning},
  author={L. Skitka},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2002},
  volume={28},
  pages={588 - 597}
}
  • L. Skitka
  • Published 2002
  • Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This study explored whether personal identity concerns relate in important ways to how people decide whether an event is fair or unfair. Because moral mandates are selective expressions of values that are central to people’s sense of personal identity, people should be highly motivated to protect these positions from possible threat. Consistent with predictions based on a value protection model of justice, whether people had a moral mandate on abortion, civil rights, or immigration was… Expand
246 Citations

Tables from this paper

Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?
The Dark Side of Moral Conviction
The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
Procedural Justice and Participation
A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
...
1
2
3
4
5
...