Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation

@article{Ecker2014DoPK,
  title={Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation},
  author={Ullrich K. H. Ecker and Stephan Lewandowsky and Olivia Fenton and Kelsey Martin},
  journal={Memory \& Cognition},
  year={2014},
  volume={42},
  pages={292-304}
}
Misinformation—defined as information that is initially assumed to be valid but is later corrected or retracted—often has an ongoing effect on people’s memory and reasoning. We tested the hypotheses that (a) reliance on misinformation is affected by people’s preexisting attitudes and (b) attitudes determine the effectiveness of retractions. In two experiments, participants scoring higher and lower on a racial prejudice scale read a news report regarding a robbery. In one scenario, the suspects… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections
Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous researchExpand
Polarity and attitude effects in the continued-influence paradigm
Abstract Misinformation – information that is false or inaccurate – can continue to influence people’s memory and reasoning even after it has been corrected. Researchers have termed this theExpand
Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample
TLDR
Examining a sample of 429 pre-screened US participants supporting either the Democratic or Republican Party found no impact of political worldview on retraction effectiveness, let alone evidence of a backfire effect, and thus the present study did not replicate the asymmetry observed in the Australian-based study. Expand
Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect
TLDR
Findings suggest that at least some of the evidence for the continued use of retracted information may be due to some people not accepting the retraction, even in the absence of external motivation to disregard it. Expand
Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon
TLDR
Findings suggest that people use political figures as a heuristic to guide evaluation of what is true or false, yet do not necessarily insist on veracity as a prerequisite for supporting political candidates. Expand
Reminders and Repetition of Misinformation:: Helping or Hindering Its Retraction?
People frequently rely on information even after it has been retracted, a phenomenon known as the continued-influence effect of misinformation. One factor proposed to explain the ineffectiveness ofExpand
Misleading Information in Social Media News: How Bias Affects Perceptions
Correcting misinformation is challenging because of the difficulty in changing biases (Ecker et al., 2013). Biased decisions are learned behaviors. People choose information that they are moreExpand
Dis)continuing the continued influence effect of misinformation
Misinformation can often have a lasting impact on the causal inferences people make about events even after it is unambiguously corrected. This is known as the continued influence effect ofExpand
Not wallowing in misery – retractions of negative misinformation are effective in depressive rumination
TLDR
Evidence against the hypothesis that the retraction of negative misinformation might be less effective in depressive ruminators is found and findings are interpreted in terms of an attentional bias that may enhance the salience ofnegative misinformation and may facilitate its updating in depressive rumination. Expand
Misinformation and How to Correct It
The increasing prevalence of misinformation in society may adversely affect democratic decision making, which depends on a well-informed public. False information can originate from a number ofExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 65 REFERENCES
Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence
People who hold strong opinions on complex social issues are likely to examine relevant empirical evidence in a biased manner. They are apt to accept "confirming" evidence at face value whileExpand
Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.
  • E. Loftus
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Learning & memory
  • 2005
TLDR
This review of the field ends with a brief discussion of the newer work involving misinformation that has explored the processes by which people come to believe falsely that they experienced rich complex events that never, in fact, occurred. Expand
When in Doubt, Shout!
TLDR
People whose confidence in closely held beliefs was undermined engaged in more advocacy of their beliefs than did people whose confidence was not undermined, and the effect was attenuated when individuals affirmed their beliefs, and was moderated by both importance of the belief and open-mindedness of a message recipient. Expand
Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation
TLDR
The effects of retractions and disconfirmations of the 2003 Iraq War on people's memory for and beliefs about war-related events in two coalition countries (Australia and the United States) and one country that opposed the war (Germany) are investigated. Expand
Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation
TLDR
This study investigated whether the continued influence of misinformation can be reduced by explicitly warning people at the outset that they may be misled, and found that a specific warning succeeded in reducing the continued reliance on outdated information but did not eliminate it. Expand
Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences.
Several lines of research have found that information previously encoded into memory can influence inferences and judgments, even when more recent information discredits it. Previous theories haveExpand
Misinformation and Its Correction
TLDR
Recommendations may help practitioners—including journalists, health professionals, educators, and science communicators—design effective misinformation retractions, educational tools, and public-information campaigns. Expand
Terrorists brought down the plane!—No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information
TLDR
The impact of emotionality of the material on people's ability to discount corrected misinformation was investigated, with a focus on moderate levels of emotionability comparable to those elicited by real-world news reports. Expand
Are Racial Stereotypes Really Fading? The Princeton Trilogy Revisited
In this article, the authors identify three methodological short-comings of the classic Princeton trilogy studies: (a) ambiguity of the instructions given to respondents, (b) no assessment ofExpand
"There Must Be a Reason": Osama, Saddam, and Inferred Justification
One of the most curious aspects of the 2004 presidential election was the strength and resilience of the belief among many Americans that Saddam Hussein was linked to the terrorist attacks ofExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...