Do liberal ties pacify? A study of the Cod Wars

  title={Do liberal ties pacify? A study of the Cod Wars},
  author={Sverrir Steinsson},
  journal={Cooperation and Conflict},
  pages={339 - 355}
The Cod Wars, three militarized interstate disputes between the UK and Iceland (1958–1961, 1972–1973, 1975–1976), have often been presented as an egregious exception to the liberal peace. There are, however, few comprehensive analyses of the liberal dimensions of the Cod Wars. This article comprehensively analyses the ways in which each of the Cod Wars is consistent or inconsistent with the liberal peace. I find that while the supposedly pacifying factors of the liberal peace – democracy, trade… 

Reinvigorating a political ecology of the global agri-food system

This contribution is a critical review of research on the global agrifood system directly or indirectly identified as political ecology (PE). It shows how food, famine and agricultural production

Developing methods for in vitro toxicity testing with Atlantic cod tissues

Two in vitro methods have been applied and tentatively optimized for the use with Atlantic cod, indicating a possible adaption to repeated oxidative stress in the inner OslofjordCod, and the alkaline comet assay, which displayed a typical nonnormal, right-skewed distribution.



The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992

The authors test Kantian and realist theories of interstate conflict using data extending over more than a century, treating those theories as complementary rather than competing. As the classical

Fighting the Cod Wars in the Cold War: Iceland's challenge to the Western Alliance in the 1970s

Valur Ingimundarson is Associate Professor of Contemporary History at the University of Iceland and an Associate Fellow, RUSI The Cod Wars between Iceland and Britain in the 1970s were, at bottom, an

The Capitalist Peace

It is widely accepted that democracies are less conflict prone, if only with other democracies. Debate persists, however, about the causes underlying liberal peace. This article offers a contrarian

Fishing in the mild West: democratic peace and militarised interstate disputes in the transatlantic community

Abstract According to many of its proponents, the proposition that democracies do not fight each other is ‘as close as anything we have to an empirical law’. However, there have been several

Beyond Territorial Contiguity: Issues at Stake in Democratic Militarized Interstate Disputes

Scholars of international politics have been slow to address the fundamental issues that ground interstate conflict. Territory has frequently been cited as a primary source of contention among

Perverse Institutionalism: NATO and the Greco-Turkish Conflict

Last year the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly approved the expansion of the Atlantic alliance. Whereas some advocates of enlarging NATO, particularly Eastern European leaders for whom the Soviets' iron

After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy

This book is a comprehensive study of cooperation among the advanced capitalist countries. Can cooperation persist without the dominance of a single power, such as the United States after World War

Winners or Losers? Democracies in International Crisis, 1918–94

We attempt to explain when and why democratic states will prevail in international crises. We review several of the prominent theories about democratic political structures and derive hypotheses from

How ‘cod war’ came: the origins of the Anglo‐Icelandic fisheries dispute, 1958–61*

This article describes the origins of the first ‘cod war’ between Britain and Iceland in 1958–61. First, it examines the underlying factors which made it very likely that a fishing dispute of some

Liberalism and World Politics

  • M. Doyle
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1986
Building on a growing literature in international political science, I reexamine the traditional liberal claim that governments founded on a respect for individual liberty exercise “restraint” and