Do cisgenic plants warrant less stringent oversight?

  title={Do cisgenic plants warrant less stringent oversight?},
  author={H. Schouten and F. Krens and E. Jacobsen},
  journal={Nature Biotechnology},
1. Andow, D.A. & Hilbeck, A. BioScience 54, 637–649 (2004). 2. EuropaBio. Safety Assessment of GM crops. Document 1.1 Substantial Equivalence—Maize (EuropaBio, Brussels, 2003). < pdf> (accessed 20 May 2006). 3. Bradford, K.J., Van Deynze, A., Gutterson, N., Parrott, W. & Strauss, S.H. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 439–444 (2005). 4. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA 630/R-95-002F… Expand
The slippery slope of cisgenesis
If the postulated cisgenesis concept alone is exempted from the regulation that currently applies to GM crop plants, the authors would enter a slippery slope that inexorably leads away from objective and unbiased scientific principles. Expand
Reply to 'Cisgenic' as a product designation
1331 factor in the acceptance of the technology. Analysis of the results of the most recent Eurobarometer on biotech10 demonstrates that the lack of trust of citizens in regulation of geneticExpand
The case for regulating intragenic GMOs
The ethical and regulatory issues raised by “intragenics” – organisms that have been genetically modified using gene technologies, but that do not contain DNA from another species are discussed. Expand
Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants
The European legal framework defines GMOs and specifies various breeding techniques that are excluded from the GMO regulations as a starting point, particularly the European Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment. Expand
Cisgenics - A Sustainable Approach for Crop Improvement
The implications of cisgenesis towards the sustainable development in the genetic improvement of crops and the prospects for the technology are considered. Expand
Cisgenics as emerging bio-objects: bio-objectification and bio-identification in agrobiotech innovation
Drawing from the concepts of bio-objectification and bio-identification, it is shown how the status of cisgenics is likely to remain contested and contestable. Expand
Governance of genetic biocontrol technologies for invasive fish
Researchers and would-be users of GBC for invasive fish must proactively engage with a variety of stakeholders to improve governance (in fish and other taxa), which may include reconfiguration of relevant national governance systems, meaningful stakeholder dialogue and the creation of a new international treaty dedicated to biological control. Expand
EU GM Crop Regulation: A Road to Resolution or a Regulatory Roundabout?
Since first embarking on the road of risk management options for the regulation of recombinant DNA (rDNA) activities and use in 1978, the European Union (EU) has largely failed to create a regulatoryExpand
Cisgenesis and intragenesis: new tools for improving crops.
The grape is one of the most cultivated crops worldwide and is the most economically relevant crop in Chile, and its genomic sequence has been completed, making available new sources of information to improve grape traits by genetic manipulation. Expand
Genetic Engineering and Transgenic Breeding
Transgenic seed technology takes about 10 years to be in the market. Its performance should be assessed through environmental, economic, and social impacts, which are the pillars of sustainableExpand


Global impact of mutation-derived varieties
Induced mutations will continue to have an increasing role in creating crop varieties with traits such as modified oil, protein and starch quality, enhanced uptake of specific metals, deeper rooting system, and resistance to drought, diseases and salinity as a major component of the environmentally sustainable agriculture. Expand
Mutation Breeding: Theory and Practical Applications
This chapter discusses mutation breeding in seed propagated crops, and in vitro techniques for mutation breeding, and some of the techniques used in this chapter were previously described. Expand
Safety Assessment of GM crops . Document 1 . 1 Substantial Equivalence — Maize ( EuropaBio , Brussels , 2003 )
  • BioScience
  • 2004